Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
1967 - 1968 / Re: 67 Dearborn Sound Deadener & Seam sealer references
« Last post by J_Speegle on July 20, 2017, 07:32:33 PM »
Remember that the the undercarriage (this year and plant) were applied after the floor paint/primer was applied not before like in the trunk, interior and many other locations.

Don't want you to get ahead of yourself  ;)
22
1964 1/2 - 1966 / Re: 260 Generator Adjusting arm
« Last post by Hipo giddyup on July 20, 2017, 07:04:13 PM »
Totally understandable Jeff. Cropping is a good solution as well.
23
Someone in my local auto club is looking for a Mach 1 here in New Jersey. They are willing to travel to New York,
Pennsylvania, Maryland or Delaware to purchase.

Not looking for a project...., but must be turn key solid mechanically, solid body, with a local show paint level and nice interior.

Please only reach out if you have a car you would like to sell within the above guidelines.
      Kevin Home Phone #: 732-449-2971
      kschuerman@verizon.net





24
1967 - 1968 / Re: 67 Dearborn Sound Deadener & Seam sealer references
« Last post by brennancarey on July 20, 2017, 04:49:04 PM »
Thks Jeff... as usual your help is appreciated and invaluable. Will tackle on the weekend and report back with my progress !

25
1964 1/2 - 1966 / Re: 289 engine / bracket assembly process
« Last post by jwc66k on July 20, 2017, 04:29:37 PM »
I believe it was Jim's documents (images in Reply #6) that prompted me to comment the thread covers multiple years. I would say those two documents cover multiple years (I know they help a lot for 67's anyways).
Faced with too little (none) or too much information, I just posed what data I had, with the (limited) sources referenced. I am always open to adding new information.
Jim
26
1964 1/2 - 1966 / Re: 260 Generator Adjusting arm
« Last post by J_Speegle on July 20, 2017, 02:55:59 PM »
Touche' Jeff. That pic was from 2012 and I have learned a lot / fixed a lot since then. It was just one of the better pics I had to help show the Gen bracket.  ;)

The comments  were more for others since posting here some might assume that things are 100% or close to if left unmentioned.  I often crop pictures I post so that it minimizes the thread going a different direction or having to add captions of "this or that" in the picture aren't correct ;) 

Its about unintended consequences loke many things in life .
27
1964 1/2 - 1966 / Re: 260 Generator Adjusting arm
« Last post by krelboyne on July 20, 2017, 12:28:30 PM »
That looks correct, based on page 4-50 of Bob Mannel's book.
28
1964 1/2 - 1966 / Re: 260 Generator Adjusting arm
« Last post by caspian65 on July 20, 2017, 10:48:42 AM »
Cropped to help focus on the item in question.  ;D :)
29
1969 - 1970 / Re: Tach VS non-Tach dash harness
« Last post by Coralsnake on July 20, 2017, 10:38:38 AM »
I shall give you another viewpoint...

How much is is your car worth? Do you think that this an area you want to use a less expensive part?

Based on the time it takes to replace a harness and its importance, I would argue you want the best possible part. The two harnesses (tach vs nontach) are fundamentally different. If you change the underdash, the headlight, the engine gauge feed and the alternator harnesses also need to be changed.




I would also disagree with the characterization that Alloy harness wont stand up to the original in appearance and function. The harnesses have been used by many Shelby show cars for decades. Ford literally made hundreds of thousands of Mustangs in 1970, not every harness was the same. Alloy harnesses are new, not brittle, same connectors, same gauge wires and almost always the same colors as OEM wires.

If you need more help, I can probably do better on the price than $800, but you still need to take the others into consideration. Just something to consider. In summary, dont try to do this on the cheap.

Coralsnake68@hotmail.com

30
1964 1/2 - 1966 / Re: 260 Generator Adjusting arm
« Last post by Hipo giddyup on July 20, 2017, 09:20:26 AM »
Touche' Jeff. That pic was from 2012 and I have learned a lot / fixed a lot since then. It was just one of the better pics I had to help show the Gen bracket.  ;)
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10