Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Wanted Ads / wanted: 2006 Mustang seat cover
« Last post by carlite65 on Today at 10:04:48 PM »
looking for 2006 mustang cloth seat cover. dark charcoal. driver side back. must be actual ford product. must have seat belt retainer strap with magnet not snap. code PW.
2
General Discussion / Re: Rant on old Concours Wiring Restorations
« Last post by JohnSlack on Today at 08:50:08 PM »
Earlier this week, I received a beautifully looking 1968 tach underdash harness to go through as a double-check, since it was refurbished by Pat White at least 20 years ago and never installed.  Great, I thought...should be a piece of cake for me!  This harness looked at first glance to be pristine and well done.  I start checking it out, and noticed that one of the dash cluster connectors (should be an 8 pin female and a 6 pin male) were both 8 pins.  Huh?  I contacted the owner to verify that his dash cluster connector was a 6 pin female, and it was.  That was when he told me the story of the harness.  I replaced the connector, and continued on with my checking.  What's this?  The two wires for the brake switch were swapped...no biggie electrically, but for being concours correct?  No way!  Then I found molex pins with soldered joints rather than crimped.  I also had to replace an OEM splice for the resistor wire going to the rear defogger. 
I guess 25+ years ago when there were no reproductions, one had to use one of the few concours-level restorers.  Having now examined both a Pat White and Bill Healy examples, I am somewhat disappointed in the quality of the electrical work.  The aesthetic appearance of each were outstanding, but still...
I still have yet to find out what it cost folks back in the day to refurbish to concours level wiring...just curious.  For me, the electrical performance of the work should match or exceed the appearance, regardless of concours quality or not.  I cannot afford the time/effort to refurbish wiring to concours-level standards and keep my price points and sanity.
Rant over.

Randy,

I get it, I was just asked to "fix" a car that had just been finished by a high end restoration shop. The car is beautiful, however it doesn't run, in addition the wiring is not that great, he was able to pay a zillion dollars and come up with NOS. The restoration shop just responded with, oh, most people don't drive these cars anymore and as long as they are pretty....we are good.


John
3
Jim, thanks for the quick response.
You're welcome.
I have analysed the cast number when I first got hold of Muscadelle, and could conclude the cast date of the engine block to be 22 sept '65.
The actual production date of the car would be 07 okt '65.
The engine casting date is located on the lower right hand side behind the starter. Your should see this Ford part number "C5AE-6015-E" in raised letters along with the casting date. The actual engine assemble date is actually in two places, on the mounting surface for the oil pan and not visible unless the oil pan is removed, and as I described above, by the distributor.
Engine blocks were cast, then allowed to cool outdoors for a couple of days (occasionally a month or two) before machining and assembly.
Jim
4
1970 Mustang / Re: Roof Side Weatherstrip Clip
« Last post by KevinK on Today at 03:02:03 PM »
I only recall them being used on the front of the 69 coupe. The photos with 2 are clearly 70.
5
Modern urethanes are usually the most preferable.  Go with a single stage and have it flattened to something like an eggshell/satin appearance.  Original was lacquer, but it doesn't hold up very well with use.. ring/watch scratches, shoe scuffs.
6
Parts for Sale / Re: 67 Oem dash pad
« Last post by 68GT/CSconvmod on Today at 02:07:33 PM »
BTT
7
1970 Mustang / Re: Roof Side Weatherstrip Clip
« Last post by alanmac on Today at 01:36:13 PM »
Is the posters link the correct guide clip part for a 70? 
8
Parts / Re: Help! Distributor part gone.
« Last post by carlite65 on Today at 01:26:13 PM »
never knew a time when he did not come through. great place to deal with.
9
I am looking to paint the dash, doors... of the interior of my 1964.5 convertible with blue Code 82 interior.  I was talking with the guys at TCP global and they gave two options acrylic Enamel and Acrylic Urethane.  He told me the advantages and disadvantages of both.  But what I am most concerned with is matching the original sheen.  Is there one of these paints that matches the original sheen better than the other?

Thank you,

Corey
10
Interior & Trunk / MOVED: Convertible top boot
« Last post by J_Speegle on Today at 11:57:50 AM »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10