Author Topic: 67 SJ Running Change? Survey - Additional Battery Hold-down Bracket  (Read 3274 times)

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24232
Working down the list of running changes that took place during 1967 production at San Jose as the title states this thread we're looking at the extra/needed additional battery upper anchor/support that connected the outer battery hold down bolt to the inner fender panel on the passenger side.

This detail may (likely) not be a running change but instead connected instead to a specific option or a combination of both so lets see what the evidence suggests to us.

The focus -

On most cars the battery his held down using a top clamp and two "J"/hook shaped (at the bottom) bolts on either side of the battery as shown below in an original picture from the time period.






Non-San Jose original example but shows the typical bracketing.






On a far number of cars we have found evidence of an additional hole in the inner fender panel and through or not through fender for a bracket that provided additional stabilization and that connected the outer battery hold down bolt to the car. Example of the screw hole and bracket below.

Bracket painted semi-gloss black. 


67 GT500 from around March example




Close up of head markings of the screw from one example. Apparently PO removed the bracket but reinserted the screw back in the original hole for some reason.




++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Anyone having some solid examples with VIN and real build date (even projected) is invited to submit those details to the process

Will post my findings and we'll see what we can make of them. This one might be a tough one given the possibilities.

Will look at the results comparing all cars and also separate out the Shelby's just in case how they were ordered or designed makes a difference.
« Last Edit: August 05, 2019, 07:18:20 PM by J_Speegle »
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 8998
Re: 67 SJ Running Change Survey - Additional Battery Hold-down Bracket
« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2019, 08:06:30 PM »
I don't believe the extra battery hold down support is a running change given it is seen through out production with more aprons that do NOT have the extra hole for the bracket then do. One thing that the pictures that Jeff first posted show is the Zinc silver early battery hold down J hooks seen in vintage photos vs. the Phosphate and oil ones that are more typical on later versions though 1969. That is a running change.
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline Bossbill

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3249
  • In the middle of project hell
Re: 67 SJ Running Change? Survey - Additional Battery Hold-down Bracket
« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2019, 08:41:27 PM »
The Shelby has the hole. It has the heavy duty battery. Wonder if that is the reason.
7R01C189340 parts cars est date 06C does not.
Bill
Concours  Actual Ford Build 3/2/67 GT350 01375
Driven      6/6/70 0T02G160xxx Boss 302
Modified   5/18/65 5F09A728xxx 347 Terminator-X 8-Stack
Race        65 2+2 Coupe conversion

Offline 67gta289

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3025
Re: 67 SJ Running Change? Survey - Additional Battery Hold-down Bracket
« Reply #3 on: July 24, 2019, 06:48:07 AM »
My signature car does not have the bracket, nor the related hole.  Standard battery.
John
67 289 GTA Dec 20 1966 San Jose
7R02C156xxx
MCA 74660

Offline 67gtasanjose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5086
  • "Take the MUSTANG PLEDGE"
Re: 67 SJ Running Change? Survey - Additional Battery Hold-down Bracket
« Reply #4 on: July 24, 2019, 06:49:02 AM »
What is the EARLIEST KNOWN assembly date of the use of this bracket?
I wonder if perhaps a Service Bulletin has anything to do with the random findings is why I ask.
A late-dated service bulletin may explain it if Ford reinforced the underside of the apron, the bracket may have been omitted in production.
I am only spitballing an idea, I have no horse in this race. I do have a "repaired" original Novemer '66 apron that was either cracked or corroded by acid that did not have any bracket. It DID have a group 22F tray [all parts original with confirmed date codes matching build date]. The battery tray has only minor corrosion and the "braised" repair looks more consistent with a crack than it does to corrosion,  thus perhaps adding a small amount of credence to this theory.

I should take a new look at this repair. I will not "remove" the repair, it seems to be successful in repairing the problem so my plan was to leave it alone but perhaps I can see if it was or was not corrosion as the reason for the repairs.
« Last Edit: July 24, 2019, 06:54:49 AM by 67gtasanjose »
Richard Urch

1967 (11/2/66, S.J.) GTA Luxury Coupe, 289-4V w/Thermactor Emissions, C-4, Int./Ext. Decor +many options

2005 (04/05) GT Premium Convertible, Windveil Blue, Parchment Top w/Med. Parchment interior,  Roush Body Appointments

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24232
Re: 67 SJ Running Change? Survey - Additional Battery Hold-down Bracket
« Reply #5 on: July 29, 2019, 10:17:40 PM »
What is the EARLIEST KNOWN assembly date of the use of this bracket?

Have ALLOT fewer samples from the 66 period when compared to after December just because of the influence of the large volume of Shelbys that help out in the later half and may be different (with or without) than the typical Mustang.

With that said - right now I have the period suggesting mid December to mid Jan as the beginning and for Shelby's the practice changing again in the later part of their production back to no brackets used.
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline Paperback Writer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 295
Re: 67 SJ Running Change? Survey - Additional Battery Hold-down Bracket
« Reply #6 on: July 30, 2019, 12:20:48 PM »
My car (Sept 22, 1966 SJ build date) did not have this bracket/fender apron hole either.
Standard battery too...
« Last Edit: July 30, 2019, 12:25:14 PM by Paperback Writer »
1967 390 GTA Convertible
7R03S110###
76B - V - 6U - 30J - 72 - 1 - U
(Actually built on 9/22/1966 - Eight days ahead of schedule)

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 8998
Re: 67 SJ Running Change? Survey - Additional Battery Hold-down Bracket
« Reply #7 on: July 30, 2019, 12:58:06 PM »
This is a post from another thread but information is aplicable here
Bob I believe you are correct concerning big blocks, but in the other engines a 22F was the standard and the 24F was the heavy duty. I am not sure what color of caps heavy duty may have had.
A few years ago I restored a late 67 200 I6 that had a 22F and the Z bracket. It is unclear to me what triggered it's use.
A 22 F battery and the additional hold down bracket would not seem consistent with a Heavy duty battery triggering the use of the bracket theory. Any additional information on that car Marty? Maybe just a anomaly and maybe not.
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24232
Re: 67 SJ Running Change? Survey - Additional Battery Hold-down Bracket
« Reply #8 on: July 30, 2019, 07:03:29 PM »
Marty if you see this . How "late" of a car was it?  If you have any records from the car.
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline ruppstang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3837
Re: 67 SJ Running Change? Survey - Additional Battery Hold-down Bracket
« Reply #9 on: July 31, 2019, 12:37:40 AM »
I did not get a Marti report for this car because it was a flip project. I will see if I can find the door tag information.
Here is a picture if you look closely you can see the bracket hole in the apron.

Offline ruppstang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3837
Re: 67 SJ Running Change? Survey - Additional Battery Hold-down Bracket
« Reply #10 on: August 04, 2019, 10:13:52 AM »
Marty if you see this . How "late" of a car was it?  If you have any records from the car.
This is a post from another thread but information is aplicable here A 22 F battery and the additional hold down bracket would not seem consistent with a Heavy duty battery triggering the use of the bracket theory. Any additional information on that car Marty? Maybe just a anomaly and maybe not.

I got the new owner to take some pictures for me.

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 8998
Re: 67 SJ Running Change? Survey - Additional Battery Hold-down Bracket
« Reply #11 on: August 04, 2019, 04:43:44 PM »
Thank you for the update and info. Also great to see that the car has been restored(?) or cleaned up.
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24232
Re: 67 SJ Running Change? Survey - Additional Battery Hold-down Bracket
« Reply #12 on: August 04, 2019, 09:46:23 PM »
Thanks Marti will add to the spread sheet

Fits right in with the washer bottle and service decal surveys also that are currently going on
« Last Edit: August 04, 2019, 09:49:39 PM by J_Speegle »
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline Fastback2013

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: 67 SJ Running Change? Survey - Additional Battery Hold-down Bracket
« Reply #13 on: August 05, 2019, 06:15:52 AM »
My signature car don't have the extra hole in the inner fender panel.
When purchased the car it hadn't the original battery and the Marti report doesn't mention anything concerning the battery, so I assume it was the standard one.
Kind regards,
Jeroen
San Jose 7R02C1708xx
Fastback GTA
built on 01/12/1967

Offline Bossbill

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3249
  • In the middle of project hell
Re: 67 SJ Running Change? Survey - Additional Battery Hold-down Bracket
« Reply #14 on: August 24, 2019, 06:13:36 PM »
7R03A206***, a very original car,  with 08E plate date.
Bill
Concours  Actual Ford Build 3/2/67 GT350 01375
Driven      6/6/70 0T02G160xxx Boss 302
Modified   5/18/65 5F09A728xxx 347 Terminator-X 8-Stack
Race        65 2+2 Coupe conversion