ConcoursMustang Forums

Restoring - General discussions that span across many different groups of years and models => Drivetrain => Topic started by: bryancobb on February 21, 2011, 07:09:38 AM

Title: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: bryancobb on February 21, 2011, 07:09:38 AM
Hi Folks,

Can anyone provide some insight (hopefully pictures) about the hand-markings or stenciling on the case of a C-4 transmission.

Specifically, my MAR 66 Metuchen C-Code convt.  There was no evidence of paint marks, etc. on the case, tail-cone, or bellhousing.  I have cleaned all 3 pieces and they look brand new, and I want to recreate the markings.

The car's history is very complete and there's no evidence the transmission has ever been replaced.  The tag is date-appropriate.

Thanks,
Bryan
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: CharlesTurner on February 21, 2011, 10:17:02 AM
Unfortunately not a '66 nor a V8, but here are some nice detail pics of a Jan '65 San Jose C4 from an I6:

http://www.early-mustang.com/charles/65_C4/
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: Ivygreen65 on February 21, 2011, 10:36:58 AM
Bryan,

Here are a couple of pictures of my late 65 Dearborn 289 C4.  I know it's not the same as yours, but they may help you in some way. 

I don't have the before pictures on this computer, but I replicated everything I found originally.
(http://pic80.picturetrail.com/VOL847/1785303/3437215/187722530.jpg)
(http://pic80.picturetrail.com/VOL847/1785303/3437215/187722523.jpg)
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: bryancobb on February 21, 2011, 12:37:30 PM
Unfortunately not a '66 nor a V8, but here are some nice detail pics of a Jan '65 San Jose C4 from an I6:

http://www.early-mustang.com/charles/65_C4/

Thanks Charles,
Could you tell what that black rectangle says?  I can't tell in the picture.
And...  I would think these markings were applied at the transmission assembly plant and shipped fully assembled to the three car plants.  Is it reasonable to assume that all plants had similar markings on the transmission assemblies?
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: bryancobb on February 21, 2011, 12:43:14 PM
Bryan,

Here are a couple of pictures of my late 65 Dearborn 289 C4.  I know it's not the same as yours, but they may help you in some way. 

I don't have the before pictures on this computer, but I replicated everything I found originally.

Thanks
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: J_Speegle on February 21, 2011, 03:59:29 PM
Thanks Charles,
Could you tell what that black rectangle says?  I can't tell in the picture.
And...  I would think these markings were applied at the transmission assembly plant and shipped fully assembled to the three car plants.  Is it reasonable to assume that all plants had similar markings on the transmission assemblies?


The challenge I've found with markings on Automatics is that the vast majority of them have been rebuilt and either stripped of marks (during cleaning of the case) swapped for another at the rebuilder (so 68-up check for the VIN) or painted with paint at the rebuilders

I would agree that most (not all) of the marks would be similar (inspector and assembler marks would vary of course) between the different plant if you compare trans from similar periods of time
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: Twilight65 on February 21, 2011, 06:39:40 PM
Bryan, I posted below the pictures of the markings I found on my May 66 C4 w/200. I only found 3 marks. On the tail piece I found a shot of orange spray paint. I found an "OK" stamp in a dark blue. And I found a sequence of 4 numbers in dark red. I could only make the last two digits out and they were ??15. I noticed on Charles pictures his has a number stamped "4615" so maybe the same.
Dave

(http://i664.photobucket.com/albums/vv8/dkcain1/SDC10113-2-1.jpg)
(http://i664.photobucket.com/albums/vv8/dkcain1/SDC101482-1.jpg)
(http://i664.photobucket.com/albums/vv8/dkcain1/SDC10133.jpg)
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: bryancobb on February 21, 2011, 07:34:35 PM
Thanks Dave,

You guys are great!
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: CharlesTurner on February 21, 2011, 07:53:15 PM
The black mark is a reverse 'OK'  I actually have one of the original stamps, given to me by a retired worker from the Sharonville C4 plant.
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: bryancobb on February 21, 2011, 07:59:14 PM
The black mark is a reverse 'OK'  I actually have one of the original stamps, given to me by a retired worker from the Sharonville C4 plant.

I THINK YOU BETTER POST A PICTURE OF THAT!!!!
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: CharlesTurner on February 21, 2011, 08:01:04 PM
It's just a regular rubber stamp, nothing fancy.
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: bryancobb on February 21, 2011, 08:50:57 PM
How big is the rectangle and how big is the OK?
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: CharlesTurner on February 21, 2011, 09:08:55 PM
Probably about 1 1/2" high.  It's the same type of stamp used on top of that 6 cyl. trans I shared pics of.
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: bryancobb on February 21, 2011, 09:19:59 PM
I guessed that, but I just didn't have a good reference in that picture.  It looked a lot larger that 1-1/2"

Did you see my question about AUTOLITE or FoMoCo script coil?
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: TLea on February 21, 2011, 09:42:03 PM
The black OK isn't unique to 66 Dearborn. From 68 NJ,

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c74/tlea/DSCN3978.jpg)
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: bryancobb on February 22, 2011, 06:38:43 AM
Thanks Tim,

Charles showes the 65 where the "OK" is reverse lettering in a black rectangle.
I guess in 68, the reverse was changed to a POSITIVE.
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: TLea on February 22, 2011, 08:20:59 AM
Thanks Tim,

Charles showes the 65 where the "OK" is reverse lettering in a black rectangle.
I guess in 68, the reverse was changed to a POSITIVE.
Way before that. If you look at Dave's 66 picture the OK is same and same location. Mine also had the dark red 4 digit # on the other side top
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: Skyway65 on February 22, 2011, 07:24:03 PM
Anybody have a theory as to what all the orange paint was for?  It seems to be equally spread over both the V8 and 6 cyl versions with little regard to any real meaning.  Orange all over the tailshaft and bellhousing...hmmmm... ???
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: bryancobb on February 22, 2011, 07:54:33 PM
I'll bet Charles' C-4 Transmission Plant Employee Friend could shed some light on this subject, as well as the 4 digit red machinists' marking dye number.
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: J_Speegle on February 22, 2011, 09:26:12 PM
Anybody have a theory as to what all the orange paint was for?  It seems to be equally spread over both the V8 and 6 cyl versions with little regard to any real meaning.  Orange all over the tailshaft and bellhousing...hmmmm... ???

Likely IMHO some form or quick identification method. ;)
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: 68 S Code on February 22, 2011, 09:41:06 PM
The OK may not be reversed just upside down?
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: Skyway65 on February 22, 2011, 10:20:34 PM
Likely IMHO some form or quick identification method. ;)

Perhaps Jeff, but those orange paint marks seem pretty broad, messy and random; unlike the paint daubs and other color codes that we see. :-\
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: 68 S Code on February 23, 2011, 12:16:50 AM
Don't want to highjack the thread but any pics of a 68 C-6, Dearborn late spring early summer.
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: Bill Cabaniss on February 23, 2011, 04:20:35 PM
 I can shed some light on some of the markings. I worked at the FORD SheffielD aluminum casting plant in the mid 70's. The process we used had not changed from the 60's. The aluminum was poured into the case molds at 1140 degrees f. When I removed the part 90 to 120 seconds later it was still several hundred degrees hot. Before I could drop the part into a basket I had to write the shift # that i was working onto the part with a grease pencil so the part could be tracked down if there was a quality control problem. The part was hot enough to melt the grease pencil. That is why some numbers are wide and smeared looking. At the sheffield plant ,1 was midnight to 8 am. 2 was 8am to 4 pm. 3 was 4pm to midnight.  The center cases were also steel shot blasted with small steel shot in a blast machine the size if a small house. This process removed any excess flash that might be left from the casting process. I also remember at times engineers would take parts at random to the engineers office to perform critical q.c. tests. These parts would have substantial markings from engineering tests that had been performed on that particular part. This could explain why a few people have some unusual markings that others don't. Bill.
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: bryancobb on February 23, 2011, 05:48:16 PM
Hi Bill,

Thanks for your info.  It's interesting to get puzzle pieces from the ones who cut the puzzles.

Do you have any ideas about the orange spray paint on the tail cases and the center cases?

I also wonder about the 1140 degree temp you remember.  Doesn't aluminum melt around 1400?

Another question.  Did the tail cases not get shot blasted too?  The ones I have seen were very slick compared to center cases.
The blasted parts actually LOOK a little different color, because of the way they reflect the light.
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: Bill Cabaniss on February 23, 2011, 06:26:50 PM
Bryan, Let me clarify the temp. The 1140 degrees was the temp. of the molten aluminum as it was poured into the molds to form the parts. I only mentioned that part of the process to explain why the the part was still hot enough to melt the grease pencil markings. The orange spray paint could not have happened at the casting plant. It would have probably been shot blasted off in the blast machine anyway. I know you are wondering why the grease pencil marks survived the blaster. My best guess is the marking/melting process left the number very thick and  thus helped it survive the harsh environment of the blast room. One end of the blast area was called the big blast. In this area we blasted the c6 and later a.o.d. cases. On the back side was the blue goose area where we trimmed the c4/c5 center cases of excess flash and then blasted them . I worked in this area for about 1.5 years and do not recall blasting tail housings or bell housings. That could be the color difference you are referring to. After blasting, these parts were stacked into large metal baskets and loaded onto a train and shipped to the trans. assy. plants. Bryan, hope this helps, Bill.
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: bryancobb on March 01, 2011, 07:08:26 AM
Some pictures have been posted that show what appears to be a number (4-digit ) in a Souvenir Font, stamped with red, machinists' marking dye.  Does anyone have a clue or guess what the digits may be for my transmission in my Mar 66 car.
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: bryancobb on March 01, 2011, 08:50:34 AM
I have been getting info that says the transmission pan was painted black outside, Is that what you guys have seen?
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: CharlesTurner on March 01, 2011, 08:52:37 AM
I have been getting info that says the transmission pan was painted black outside, Is that what you guys have seen?

Haven't seen an original painted black, only seen natural.
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: J_Speegle on March 01, 2011, 04:12:30 PM
Haven't seen an original painted black, only seen natural.

+1 for any of the classic Mustangs
Title: Re: C-4 Markings/Daubs
Post by: bryancobb on March 18, 2011, 04:46:20 PM
(http://i950.photobucket.com/albums/ad350/bryancobb/DSCN2182.jpg)

Looks OK to me.