1
1967 Mustang / Re: 1967 Fastback 289 2V Engine Mounts
« Last post by RoyceP on April 30, 2024, 10:23:51 PM »Only 1968 small block frame mounts will work with new rubber isolators.
News:
Join us on Facebook: Search for 'ConcoursMustang' Private group!
Recent Posts
2
1964 1/2 - 1965 / Re: Holes in dash
« Last post by birddog on April 30, 2024, 10:20:02 PM »Thanks guys! I'm going to start welding up some holes.
3
1970 Mustang / Re: 70 428CJ Question about emissions sticker
« Last post by Tucson Bruce on April 30, 2024, 09:02:53 PM »Hi John,
Yep, it's me. I finally signed up to post on here after many years of just stopping by. I always read your postings, you are a real expert on the 70 Mustangs, thanks for sharing your wisdom.
Yep, it's me. I finally signed up to post on here after many years of just stopping by. I always read your postings, you are a real expert on the 70 Mustangs, thanks for sharing your wisdom.
4
1967 Mustang / Re: 1967 Fastback 289 2V Engine Mounts
« Last post by RickP330 on April 30, 2024, 08:12:24 PM »Okay, so I think I got a handle on this, but getting confirmation is difficult. The parts suppliers simply do not know the minutia of these details.
So a set of aftermarket frame side mounts is listed as fitting 1965 to 70 and the motor mounts are listed as 1965 to 72.
It appears only the 1967 factory frame side hardware is unique.
If I just purchase the aftermarket frame side brackets and motor mounts it will fit my car and the motor will sit correctly in the chassis. At least that is what I am thinking. If it weren't for the fact I am doing major reconstructive work in this frame rail and shock tower area I would just put it in and take some measurements, but I'll be placing the shock towers based on a mock up of the engine and transmission with these as connecting parts. I'd like to know before I start fixing parts permanently.
Does the above logic sound reasonable enough? Is anyone out there with first hand experience that can offer any advice?
PS I am not being that particular about being correct.
RP
So a set of aftermarket frame side mounts is listed as fitting 1965 to 70 and the motor mounts are listed as 1965 to 72.
It appears only the 1967 factory frame side hardware is unique.
If I just purchase the aftermarket frame side brackets and motor mounts it will fit my car and the motor will sit correctly in the chassis. At least that is what I am thinking. If it weren't for the fact I am doing major reconstructive work in this frame rail and shock tower area I would just put it in and take some measurements, but I'll be placing the shock towers based on a mock up of the engine and transmission with these as connecting parts. I'd like to know before I start fixing parts permanently.
Does the above logic sound reasonable enough? Is anyone out there with first hand experience that can offer any advice?
PS I am not being that particular about being correct.
RP
5
General Discussion / Re: History of my Mustang
« Last post by Tiny on April 30, 2024, 05:06:57 PM »Its been quite a while since I owned that Mustang, I now have a 67 390 GT Coupe. The 66 was my first Mustang and I restored it as much as original as possible, so all of the suspension, exhaust interior engine bay etc was Factory. I prefer the original look that the souped up versions of the Mustang.
6
Parts for Sale / Re: 1964 / 65 / 66 DEP C4ZE-8005 A14AE radiator for M/trans (price reduced)
« Last post by CW4macret on April 30, 2024, 03:39:47 PM »Bump
7
1969 Mustang / Re: 1969 351 2V carburettor
« Last post by Coralsnake on April 30, 2024, 03:20:42 PM »Not sure if this will help, but it might
Its going to matter if its for a manual or automatic trans, but it will look similar to this one:
https://www.northeastclassicfordparts.com/product/professionally-rebuilt-autolite-2100-2bbl-carburetor-auto-trans-manual-choke-1-23-venturi-1968-1969-f-series-390ci/
Not concours, but the C9ZF-A is for manuals
https://secure.cougarpartscatalog.com/c9zf-9510-a.html
The C9ZF-B is for automatics
Its going to matter if its for a manual or automatic trans, but it will look similar to this one:
https://www.northeastclassicfordparts.com/product/professionally-rebuilt-autolite-2100-2bbl-carburetor-auto-trans-manual-choke-1-23-venturi-1968-1969-f-series-390ci/
Not concours, but the C9ZF-A is for manuals
https://secure.cougarpartscatalog.com/c9zf-9510-a.html
The C9ZF-B is for automatics
8
Parts for Sale / Re: 12-65 dated San Jose radiator automatic transmission
« Last post by mgreene on April 30, 2024, 11:42:29 AM »Thanks! That worked!
9
1964 1/2 - 1965 / Re: Holes in dash
« Last post by jwc66k on April 30, 2024, 11:41:22 AM »As I read the post the GT light switch was one (the first) of two requests \It's my one track mind in action.
OP wrote - "I would also like to weld all other holes under the dash. Some are pretty obvious that they were added at a later point. Others I can't tell for sure."
Jim
10
Parts for Sale / Re: 12-65 dated San Jose radiator automatic transmission
« Last post by jwc66k on April 30, 2024, 11:36:14 AM »Phil, do you have a way to save these images to a more accessible format like jpeg or png? None of my older image apps recognize the Apple .heic format.Try https://cloudconvert.com/heic-converter
There are others.
Jim