ConcoursMustang Forums
1st Generation 1964 1/2 - 1973 - Questions & general discussions that apply to a specific year => 1964 1/2 - 1965 => Topic started by: MustangAndFairlane1867 on June 25, 2017, 01:22:14 PM
-
In my boxes of parts I've come across two different front cross-member supports. Notice in the attached pictures that one of them has two large (thick) washers tack welded to the supports ends where the attaching bolts would pass through. I don't know if this was factory, or maybe performed for unknown reasons by a previous owner. I'm in the process re-assembling at 1965 K code fastback (San Jose/2.16.1965) that's been apart for several years and at this point I'm unsure which of these cross-members is correct for my project (though I suspect it's the cross-member without the large washers). Any thoughts? Thank you, Ron
-
For judging purposes, go with the "stock" piece. The one with the washers would be accepted if accompanied with documentation.
Jim
-
In my boxes of parts I've come across two different front cross-member supports. Notice in the attached pictures that one of them has two large (thick) washers tack welded to the supports ends where the attaching bolts would pass through. I don't know if this was factory, or maybe performed for unknown reasons by a previous owner. I'm in the process re-assembling at 1965 K code fastback (San Jose/2.16.1965) that's been apart for several years and at this point I'm unsure which of these cross-members is correct for my project (though I suspect it's the cross-member without the large washers). Any thoughts? Thank you, Ron
Ron, go with the stock cross member (no washers) are my thoughts . That is if you want factory look. The other cross member is a owner modified item IMO. I am unaware of any benefits that the added spacers would give even if you didn't want a stock look. I am however curious of what the spacers would could have been for.
-
my 2cents on the spacers..........someone did not have the proper bolts for this application. have seen similar 'rigged' setups.
-
I thought maybe the PO who did this had a larger (deeper) oil pan or a different motor he wanted to install and need the extra clearance. These washers might have served as spacers for that additional 1/4" (+/-) that he needed. Ron
-
Ah, the "Shelby" shock tower mod on top applied to the "Shelby" oil pan mod on the bottom.
Jim
-
Ah, the "Shelby" shock tower mod on top applied to the "Shelby" oil pan mod on the bottom.
Jim
;D
-
Have seen this done before for a creative solution for header or oil pan clearance. Lot neater finished look on a modified car that other options