Author Topic: 65-67 group 22 Autolite Battery Discussion  (Read 19144 times)

Offline jwc66k

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7146
Re: 65-67 group 22 Auolite Battery Discussion
« Reply #90 on: January 29, 2022, 01:30:40 PM »
When in doubt, read the book.
Per the 1964 Mustang Electrical Assembly manual (AM0003) pg 11, there were three batteries used for standard assembly line Mustangs:
C3DF-10655-E, a 40 amp-hour for 170 CID I-6 engines;
C3DF-10655-G, a 55 amp-hour for 260/289 CID V-8 engines;
C3AF-10655-N, a 65 amp-hour for Regular Production Option, Z-106, V-8 engines (option Z-106 is heavy duty battery).
I'm not sure about battery filler cap colors, but I believe the 6 cylinder ones were yellow, the standard V-8 were yellow and the heavy duty were red. A green cap signified no acid had been added.
Per the 1965 Mustang Electrical Assembly Manual (AM0008) pg 11, there were two batteries used for standard assembly line Mustangs (the same information is in the 1966 Mustang Electrical Assembly Manual (AM0013) pg 16 for 1966):
C5AF-10655-A, a 45 amp-hour for all engines;
C5AF-10655-B, a 55 amp-hour for option Z-106 (shown as O-106), as "heavy duty battery option".
I believe the standard battery caps were yellow and the heavy duty caps were red.
See the attached chart below. The only correlation is size and amps. Prefix letters indicate cap color.
Service apparently sold all three types for at least the 10 year federal mandated replacement requirements. The Mustang aftermarket "trimmed' the selection to "practical" sales.
Jim
« Last Edit: January 29, 2022, 02:43:17 PM by jwc66k »
I promise to be politically correct in all my posts to keep the BBBB from vociferating.

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9022
Re: 65-67 group 22 Auolite Battery Discussion
« Reply #91 on: January 29, 2022, 02:41:27 PM »
When in doubt, read the book.
Per the 1964 Mustang Electrical Assembly manual (AM0003) pg 11, there were three batteries used for standard assembly line Mustangs:
C3DF-10655-E, a 40 amp-hour for 170 CID I-6 engines;
C3DF-10655-G, a 55 amp-hour for 260/289 CID V-8 engines;
C3AF-10655-N, a 65 amp-hour for Regular Production Option, Z-106, V-8 engines (option Z-106 is heavy duty battery).
I'm not sure about battery filler cap colors, but I believe the 6 cylinder ones were red, the standard V-8 were yellow and the heavy duty were red. A  green cap signified no acid had been added.
Per the 1965 Mustang Electrical Assembly Manual (AM0008) pg 11, there were two batteries used for standard assembly line Mustangs (the same information is in the 1966 Mustang Electrical Assembly Manual (AM0013) pg 16 for 1966):
C5AF-10655-A, a 45 amp-hour for all engines;
C5AF-10655-B, a 55 amp-hour for option Z-106 (shown as O-106), as "heavy duty battery option".
I believe the standard battery caps were yellow and the heavy duty caps were red.
See the attached chart below. The only correlation is size and amps. Prefix letters indicate cap color.
Service apparently sold all three types for at least the 10 year federal mandated replacement requirements. The Mustang aftermarket "trimmed' the selection to "practical" sales.
Jim
+1 the base car came standard with the lower capacity yellow cap battery unless the optional heavy duty version was ordered . I think A/C cars automatically got the upgrade.  The yellow cap battery was not serviced as far as I am aware . Service replacements were typically the heavy duty variety identified with a red cap. The green cap battery was another capacity service replacement that had less capacity and a lower retail price then the red cap not used on a Mustang from the factory. The green cap was cheaper but not by much which probably why not many were stocked by dealers or sold. I have had numerous 68 and up style green cap batteries over the years. I have only ever seen or heard of the 24F style with the green caps. I have not ever seen or heard of a 65-67 green cap battery. I would be interested in knowing where the  green cap = no acid came from because I hadn't heard that before . Back in the day none of the batteries being discussed came filled with acid. They were what was referred to as dry charged. You would  fill with acid and the battery developed a charge that was enough to start a car before getting fully charged. They could be stored for many decades on the shelf like that.  Years ago many of us looking for obsolete parts for our cars learned that those batteries were not used originally on any Mustang. Some learned the hard way by paying big money before being informed that they were a not used service variety .  I still see them come up for sale every so often typically with some un fact checked description. They are consequently have much less value then assemblyline used batteries of the same condition. I have seen where people would strip off the green letters and paint them red then add red caps to make them look more authentic but you could tell from the service sticker that they were not assemblyline. Well done 68 and up assemblyline stickers are now available. 
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9022
Re: 65-67 group 22 Auolite Battery Discussion
« Reply #92 on: January 29, 2022, 02:45:25 PM »
I have had and seen a group 22F yellow cap battery used, group 24F yellow cap battery used and a group 24F red cap battery used in 65-67 . 
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline preaction

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1324
Re: 65-67 group 22 Auolite Battery Discussion
« Reply #93 on: January 29, 2022, 08:54:29 PM »
Bob, are the outside cases different between the 68 and up group 22 red cap 45ah battery and the 65-67 group 22 45ah batteries ?
8F02R218047-  July 18 1968   Dearborn

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9022
Re: 65-67 group 22 Auolite Battery Discussion
« Reply #94 on: January 29, 2022, 09:13:19 PM »
Bob, are the outside cases different between the 68 and up group 22 red cap 45ah battery and the 65-67 group 22 45ah batteries ?
The biggest difference is the tops between the two styles. The rest of the case is almost the same.
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline 67gtasanjose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5086
  • "Take the MUSTANG PLEDGE"
Re: 65-67 group 22 Auolite Battery Discussion
« Reply #95 on: January 30, 2022, 08:15:47 AM »
+1 the base car came standard with the lower capacity yellow cap battery unless the optional heavy duty version was ordered . I think A/C cars automatically got the upgrade...."

That theory has been discussed before. It does stand to reason and I agree that all AC cars SHOULD (they do run substantially hotter and could use the higher cranking amps) but my particular 67 289, factory AC car does NOT have Heavy Duty battery listed on the Marti Report and it had a 22F battery tray that is date-code correct for the build.
 
For what it's worth, I made the upgrade to 24F during restoration for this very reason...it only stands to reason (especially with the list of options the car has).
Richard Urch

1967 (11/2/66, S.J.) GTA Luxury Coupe, 289-4V w/Thermactor Emissions, C-4, Int./Ext. Decor +many options

2005 (04/05) GT Premium Convertible, Windveil Blue, Parchment Top w/Med. Parchment interior,  Roush Body Appointments

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9022
Re: 65-67 group 22 Auolite Battery Discussion
« Reply #96 on: January 30, 2022, 04:15:45 PM »
That theory has been discussed before. It does stand to reason and I agree that all AC cars SHOULD (they do run substantially hotter and could use the higher cranking amps) but my particular 67 289, factory AC car does NOT have Heavy Duty battery listed on the Marti Report and it had a 22F battery tray that is date-code correct for the build.
 
For what it's worth, I made the upgrade to 24F during restoration for this very reason...it only stands to reason (especially with the list of options the car has).
I do not dispute what you found but have seen many 67 AC cars with the larger group 24 tray. I know anomalies happen and the way Ford listed things changed over time which may or may not account for things. I figure if the higher capacity battery automatically came with the A/C package that it then would not be listed as a option on the Marti report. At least that is my opinion until more compelling evidence suggests to me otherwise. It must have been a easy choice for you to upgrade the battery on your car given a group 22 battery has been obsoleted many years ago and would be hard to source.
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline jwc66k

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7146
Re: 65-67 group 22 Auolite Battery Discussion
« Reply #97 on: January 30, 2022, 04:30:58 PM »
I figure if the higher capacity battery automatically came with the A/C package that it then would not be listed as a option on the Marti report.
I think you are correct.
Jim
I promise to be politically correct in all my posts to keep the BBBB from vociferating.

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24247
Re: 65-67 group 22 Auolite Battery Discussion
« Reply #98 on: January 30, 2022, 05:00:25 PM »
Guess that leaves use with a study of buildsheets for a focused year - possibly 67  - to see what they show. Options/battery size
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline Andre Romein

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Re: 65-67 group 22 Auolite Battery Discussion
« Reply #99 on: February 16, 2022, 02:03:43 AM »
I created a 65 battery looking out of a battery case bought at Virginia Classic Mustang

Offline CharlesTurner

  • Charles Turner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7632
Re: 65-67 group 22 Auolite Battery Discussion
« Reply #100 on: February 16, 2022, 02:06:08 AM »
Curious how the warning lettering was done?

The Autolite on the top and sides would not have been painted red.
Charles Turner - MCA/SAAC Judge
Concours Mustang Forum Admin

Offline Andre Romein

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Re: 65-67 group 22 Auolite Battery Discussion
« Reply #101 on: February 16, 2022, 02:26:06 AM »
The letters are 3D printed and glued on

Offline 67gtasanjose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5086
  • "Take the MUSTANG PLEDGE"
Re: 65-67 group 22 Auolite Battery Discussion
« Reply #102 on: February 16, 2022, 06:53:23 AM »
So, this is one of the empty display cases they once had?
Do you have any other images or a description of the processes you used?
Richard Urch

1967 (11/2/66, S.J.) GTA Luxury Coupe, 289-4V w/Thermactor Emissions, C-4, Int./Ext. Decor +many options

2005 (04/05) GT Premium Convertible, Windveil Blue, Parchment Top w/Med. Parchment interior,  Roush Body Appointments

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9022
Re: 65-67 group 22 Auolite Battery Discussion
« Reply #103 on: February 16, 2022, 12:05:11 PM »
Great job .Best that I have ever seen. +1 on no paint on Autolite letters top and sides.  In its current configuration with the red caps it represents the optional heavy duty battery. Keep in mind that given information in the service specifications manual that the heavy duty 55 AH battery would use the 55 amp red stamped alternator and corresponding C5TF yellow stamped regulator.
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline carlite65

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2374
Re: 65-67 group 22 Auolite Battery Discussion
« Reply #104 on: February 16, 2022, 12:38:17 PM »
i cannot open his pic. message says i need more memory on my pc........don't have it. can it be resized?
5F09C331248