ConcoursMustang Forums

Restoring - General discussions that span across many different groups of years and models => Drivetrain => Topic started by: JamesM on May 10, 2016, 09:51:00 PM

Title: 428 C block??
Post by: JamesM on May 10, 2016, 09:51:00 PM
Hello all.
I have a standard bore block with the C scratch and 428 in the water jacket. There is a 352 with 46 below it, also there are a series of numbers on a flat smooth area, they read OZ611788. A collector/restorer of FORD's told me it was a CJ block from April 1970. Any information on what the OZ numbers mean would be appreciated.
Title: Re: 428 C block??
Post by: Coralsnake on May 10, 2016, 10:11:18 PM
O is the year (thats a derivative serial number)

Z is the plant code for St Louis, Mo ( not a Mustang plant )

Could have been a full sized Ford block, they share the same physical features.


352 is a series number only with 46 being the mold number.

Unfortunately, even if it were Mustang, it would appeal to a very small number of cars.
Title: Re: 428 C block??
Post by: JamesM on May 10, 2016, 10:50:57 PM
Knowledge makes life so much easier. Thank you for solving this for me. This engine was one of 3 that came with the car, thankfully the correct one was in the pile...
Title: Re: 428 C block??
Post by: 69cobrajetrugae2 on May 11, 2016, 02:46:43 AM
What are the numbers by the oil filter adaptor?

Check for core shift in the lifter bores. I am suspicious of standard bore blocks as it's possible that the block was a cam eater thus never got used much. 428CJ engines are not known for this defect as the 455 GM blocks are though.
Title: Re: 428 C block??
Post by: sah62 on May 11, 2016, 08:44:49 AM
A collector/restorer of FORD's told me it was a CJ block from April 1970.

It would be more correct to call it a "reinforced 428 block" that was used with the 428 CJ. There is no block that was unique to the 428 CJ. Once the reinforced block was introduced it was used for non-CJ 428 applications, too.
Title: Re: 428 C block??
Post by: JamesM on May 14, 2016, 09:37:32 PM
There is a tag with "W" and another tag below that with a O that has two dots under it then D9. Not a very scientific way I measured the bore, took a stock CJ piston and fit it into the bore (no rings). It was tight. I'll research and figure out what the other question was. My friend from whom I finally bought the car off of (trying since August 1985) was a scavenger. He had 4 cams, thinking I was really lucky he then told me they came off irrigation pumps....those were left
 in Texas.
Title: Re: 428 C block??
Post by: JamesM on May 14, 2016, 10:03:14 PM
Looking at the block as it sits vertical, the cam does look off a few thousands (from side to side, top to bottom is centered), the lifter bores are dead centered. Above the dipstick hole is 37 DIF. I was guessing the OZ611788 was a partial VIN, loosing that feeling every second. Now getting the feeling this one sat in a field pumping water for a few years.
Title: Re: 428 C block??
Post by: sportyworty on May 15, 2016, 04:19:38 PM
0D9 represents April 9th 1970
The block was cast on the West line as opposed to East
Your block was initially installed in a 1970 full size Galaxie or Meteor produced at the St. Louis plant.
Very good chance it is a true PI being a 1970. They were installing 429 2V as well in the same chassis. The last full size 428 production were almost always P code fleet cars like police/taxi
Regardless the blocks in bare form are the same. Differences in block features are date related not car model. The block improved since its introduction for 1966. By the time the CJ was introduced the 428 had evolved to a triple web with C scratch designation as opposed to early versions with out web and A scratch. There are exceptions but they are extremely rare.
Title: Re: 428 C block??
Post by: Raven R Code on September 03, 2016, 06:42:15 PM
Not sure if this one point was made clear.....a "C" scratched in the back of your 428CJ means it was designated for mustangs. Different car lines had different letters.
Title: Re: 428 C block??
Post by: sah62 on September 04, 2016, 08:33:25 AM
Not sure if this one point was made clear.....a "C" scratched in the back of your 428CJ means it was designated for mustangs. Different car lines had different letters.

I don't think this is true. We've done a lot of research as part of the 428 Cobra Jet registry project and we still haven't found a definitive source of information to translate mold marks like the "C" scratch. Remember that the 428 CJ was also used in Torinos and Fairlanes (a different car line (B) completely), but the blocks used for their engines were also marked with a "C". The 428s used in full-sized cars (again different car lines) during the 428 CJ time period also used the same reinforced block.
Title: Re: 428 C block??
Post by: RoyceP on September 05, 2016, 11:02:21 AM
What you are saying was an urban legend popular 15 - 20 years ago. Through the magic of collective knowledge and the advent of internet communications, it was debunked long ago. The C scratch started to appear on every 428 block around the fall of 1967, whether it was intended for a Mustang, Cougar, Fairlane, Torino, or granny's 428-4V powered Parklane station wagon.


Not sure if this one point was made clear.....a "C" scratched in the back of your 428CJ means it was designated for mustangs. Different car lines had different letters.
Title: Re: 428 C block??
Post by: Bob Gaines on September 05, 2016, 03:57:48 PM
What you are saying was an urban legend popular 15 - 20 years ago. Through the magic of collective knowledge and the advent of internet communications, it was debunked long ago. The C scratch started to appear on every 428 block around the fall of 1967, whether it was intended for a Mustang, Cougar, Fairlane, Torino, or granny's 428-4V powered Parklane station wagon.
428 station wagons used to be a great source for 3 web blocks (CJ) . Now the station wagons are like hens teeth to find.
Title: Re: 428 C block??
Post by: sportyworty on September 05, 2016, 10:52:19 PM
There are still quite a few 4 doors left out here in California on Craigslist. Still treasure out there between San Diego and Sacramento. I have been hunting and parting out full size P and Q code 68 cars for a couple of decades now. Picking up an April built Merc Parklane 2 door hardtop on Wednesday. It will have a great C scratch block, and 15x6 steel Shelby wheels and bonus being a mid year still has the starter delay relay. The P code also had either the c7 PI intake or the Cast CJ if built after March. This one runs and is loaded so likely refrain from parting for awhile.
I have never seen a vehicle production era 428 CJ with any scratch different than the "C"
The post 1970 428 blocks had some different scratches like CX C1. These were service and industrial applications. The pre CJ era was "A" and a limited run of "S" cast Dec 66-Jan 67 with cross bolt bosses.
I have never seen anything with more mystery and misinformation perpetuated than the FE.
Scott's website 428 reg has the most current accurate info as we know it today.
Title: Re: 428 C block??
Post by: Mark69Sportsroof on September 10, 2016, 11:52:07 PM
Interesting subject.  I have a 1968 Mercury Park lane convertible.  It was built in Apr 68 at the St Louis plant.  It still has the number matching 428-4V and C-6 tranny.  Where would these markings normally be on the engine?

Thanks Mark 
Title: Re: 428 C block??
Post by: sportyworty on September 11, 2016, 09:41:32 AM
Hi Mark

The "scratch" marks referenced are on the rear face of the cylinder block. The "C" version found on blocks cast June 67 and later can be found on either side of the block or reversed/inverted. Many are irregular versions of a letter C to appear almost as a letter U or V even.
This is the latest update on the 428 blocks used in cars built 68-70 with some mention of others
https://www.428cobrajet.org/id-block

Kerry
Title: Re: 428 C block??
Post by: RoyceP on September 17, 2016, 11:01:01 AM
If your Park Lane still has the original block it will have the "C" on the back bulkhead and it will have the heavy main webbing. The crank shaft will be a IU, the same crank and block used in the 1968 1/2 428CJ.


Interesting subject.  I have a 1968 Mercury Park lane convertible.  It was built in Apr 68 at the St Louis plant.  It still has the number matching 428-4V and C-6 tranny.  Where would these markings normally be on the engine?

Thanks Mark
Title: Re: 428 C block??
Post by: 1967 eight barrel on October 17, 2016, 01:40:05 AM
All 428's don't even have a C or an A. The scratch on the left rear side of my block looks more akin to "Schutzstaffel" A single version of the double bolt the SS used.
It's a C6ME less the A on the casting number and a SEPT 66 date of manufacture.
This makes it hell for external identification of bread and butter FE blocks with a few rare exceptions.

                                                                                                             -Keith
Title: Re: 428 C block??
Post by: sportyworty on October 28, 2016, 09:25:13 AM
can you post a pick Keith I am always interested in documenting anything new or out of the ordinary. Your block is cast during A scratch production but have several that are tough to decipher. I have S scratch blocks dated as early as first week Dec 1966.
Title: Re: 428 C block??
Post by: 1967 eight barrel on October 28, 2016, 12:26:10 PM
Sport,
I will try to remember when it comes off the stand. I have only been home since Monday night after a week in the hospital.   I used to see some weird stuff Ron Miller from Ford Power Parts came across too. I have even seen the side oiler bosses for the relief valves cast onto some of the blocks in the rear he had for sale. Always a smorgasbord of oddities back in the 80's and 90's there.

                                                                                                      -Keith
Title: Re: 428 C block??
Post by: RoyceP on October 28, 2016, 12:56:14 PM
These are common on any FE made after 1964 when the first side oilers were built for the 427 High Risers. It does not mean the block is anything special. Just a common thing, you also see some lo - po 352, 428 or 390 blocks with 427 features on one or both sides, as if the block was intended to have cross bolted mains. It is not anything special, just Ford using up mold cores that were left over from a run of 427 blocks.

Ron used to make a killing selling stuff like that to the uninformed.



Sport,
I will try to remember when it comes off the stand. I have only been home since Monday night after a week in the hospital.   I used to see some weird stuff Ron Miller from Ford Power Parts came across too. I have even seen the side oiler bosses for the relief valves cast onto some of the blocks in the rear he had for sale. Always a smorgasbord of oddities back in the 80's and 90's there.

                                                                                                      -Keith