Author Topic: 1969 MACH 1 Original vs Dealer Installed Questions  (Read 1728 times)

Offline Bob Gaines

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9034
Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
« Reply #15 on: February 18, 2021, 01:16:49 PM »
At the end of the day all things considered the car is more desirable with power steering then without given the market value and option desirability. With my judges cap on a 69 Mach I in judged competition without power steering would raise more eyebrows (not in a admirable way) as unusual then one with .
Bob Gaines,Shelby enthusiast, Shelby collector , Shelby concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Offline jwc66k

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7153
Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
« Reply #16 on: February 18, 2021, 04:37:14 PM »
Do I leave as found and keep it with power steering or do I match the Marti and return it to manual?   How does this affect the value ?
As a "driver", power steering might be a desirable add-on. My special order 69 Sportsroof (San Jose, May 69), 351W, 4v, 4sp, did not have power steering and I had no problems in either towing (a dune buggy) or "rat racing" (up some of the roads in the Santa Cruz Mountains).
As a car being shown and depending on class, I would be inclined to deduct points for - not as original (I'm a purist).
Jim
I promise to be politically correct in all my posts to keep the BBBB from vociferating.

Offline J_Speegle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24262
Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
« Reply #17 on: February 18, 2021, 04:53:16 PM »
In judging I would take notice just as I would with any detail presented might acknowledge it to the rest of the team or someone might make a comment about how big the original owners arms must have gotten :) . No different in seeing non power steering equipped Boss 302 or 428 cars. Just would find it interesting for a moment then move on. Often purpose purchased cars (cars they planned to do some racing with) would be ordered with PS or Disc brakes depending on how they planned on being used
Jeff Speegle

Anything worth doing is worth doing concours ;)

Offline STAUBY38

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 99
Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
« Reply #18 on: February 18, 2021, 08:03:05 PM »
I will compile those items and see what the part numbers all say.  Car is tucked away for the moment so I have go there and start looking.  Great info   I appreciate it !  TBC. 
1969 MACH 1 390 4 SPD
SAN JOSE BUILD 3-28-69
ACAPULCO BLUE BEAUTY

1969 MACH 1 351 AUTO
SAN JOSE BUILD 4-17-69
BLACK JADE

2013 BOSS 302
RACE RED

Offline Coralsnake

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 882
Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
« Reply #19 on: February 23, 2021, 07:43:58 AM »
Finding a car thats not a one of one is a much bigger challenge. A nice marketing gimmick, but not particularly informative for owners

Offline specialed

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1060
Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
« Reply #20 on: February 23, 2021, 11:59:15 AM »
Factory p/s cars had those 2 redish dye long well nuts pressed up into the lh frame rail hex shaped holes for installing the cast iron slave cyl bracket.  But if u bought a complete ford p/s kit from ford back in the late 60s those frame rail 2 nuts came with the kit and after they were pressed in place and u tighten the 2 bolts the top of the tall well nut  would spread apart and stay in place like a rivet would.  This is another way to tell a factory 4-speed car if the nuts are pressed into top of frame rail holes for the z-bar inner pivot bracket to be installed from factory.

Offline STAUBY38

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 99
Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
« Reply #21 on: February 23, 2021, 10:45:26 PM »
Ok Interesting, I will look at that and see what they look like.
1969 MACH 1 390 4 SPD
SAN JOSE BUILD 3-28-69
ACAPULCO BLUE BEAUTY

1969 MACH 1 351 AUTO
SAN JOSE BUILD 4-17-69
BLACK JADE

2013 BOSS 302
RACE RED

Offline preaction

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1326
Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
« Reply #22 on: February 23, 2021, 11:22:08 PM »
In judging I would take notice just as I would with any detail presented might acknowledge it to the rest of the team or someone might make a comment about how big the original owners arms must have gotten :) . No different in seeing non power steering equipped Boss 302 or 428 cars. Just would find it interesting for a moment then move on. Often purpose purchased cars (cars they planned to do some racing with) would be ordered with PS or Disc brakes depending on how they planned on being used
Would this be a good reason to leave a Marti report on the dash of a car being judged at a MCA concours level even though I believe they are not used or required ?
8F02R218047-  July 18 1968   Dearborn

NoSize

  • Guest
Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
« Reply #23 on: February 24, 2021, 03:59:43 PM »
As a "driver", power steering might be a desirable add-on. My special order 69 Sportsroof (San Jose, May 69), 351W, 4v, 4sp, did not have power steering and I had no problems in either towing (a dune buggy) or "rat racing" (up some of the roads in the Santa Cruz Mountains).
As a car being shown and depending on class, I would be inclined to deduct points for - not as original (I'm a purist).
Jim
My 69 Mach 351W didn't have power steering AND had front drum brakes. 

Offline carlite65

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2376
Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
« Reply #24 on: February 24, 2021, 04:04:44 PM »
Would this be a good reason to leave a Marti report on the dash of a car being judged at a MCA concours level even though I believe they are not used or required ?
not in my opinion. when judges first approach and introduce themselves they are supposed to ask if there is anything unusual about the car. that is the time to present your information. you make your case and they can agree or disagree.
5F09C331248

Offline preaction

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1326
Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
« Reply #25 on: February 24, 2021, 05:29:43 PM »
Thank you for the insight. :)
8F02R218047-  July 18 1968   Dearborn