ConcoursMustang Forums

1st Generation 1964 1/2 - 1973 - Questions & general discussions that apply to a specific year => 1964 1/2 - 1965 => Topic started by: 1965 t5 on November 27, 2013, 09:51:41 AM

Title: Which fan is correct for 1965 289
Post by: 1965 t5 on November 27, 2013, 09:51:41 AM
Need help identifying which fan is correct for a 1965 289 2V car, no AC.  Also, is the part number on the earlier fans?  I see part numbers on late 67/8 fans but nothing stamped on some of my other ones that I believe to be earlier.  Thanks!
Title: Re: Which fan is correct for 1965 289
Post by: jwc66k on November 27, 2013, 06:03:18 PM
The correct fan for your car is a C2OA-8600-B. The part number is not marked on the fan, the only marking is "FOMOCO' in script on both blades at one end. On my sample, there is a faint date code, E 3, stamped upside down to the FOMOCO. The blades are 17 inch long and attached at about a 75 degree angle with four rivets from the rear. Both blade have a predominant stamping about 11 inches long and about 1 inch wide that follow the angle when assembled for stiffness.
Jim
Title: Re: Which fan is correct for 1965 289
Post by: Brian Conway on November 27, 2013, 11:08:12 PM
     This fan , SC2OA-B , is on my 289/4 barrel.  Brian
Title: Re: Which fan is correct for 1965 289
Post by: rodster on November 30, 2013, 12:54:44 PM
Need help identifying which fan is correct for a 1965 289 2V car, no AC.  Also, is the part number on the earlier fans?  I see part numbers on late 67/8 fans but nothing stamped on some of my other ones that I believe to be earlier.  Thanks!

Bob Mannel's book on Small Block Fords is an excellent source of info in case you don't have it.
Title: Re: Which fan is correct for 1965 289
Post by: Brian Conway on February 18, 2014, 07:46:02 PM
     Just to follow through on this fan;  This is the fan on my 65, A code, plain Jane San Jose car.  That doesn't mean it came with or is original to the car.  This fan is 16 & 7/8" wide, two blades have the FORD logo and two are stamped 911031C73  S C2OA-B.  The extension is 2 & 7/8" long without the nipple and has the FoMoCo logo.  The letter B on the base is the only other marking.  So what do you think ?  Brian
Title: Re: Which fan is correct for 1965 289
Post by: jwc66k on February 18, 2014, 08:26:52 PM
Use the fan. I replaced the one on my 65 GT Fastback with a five blade type and put the four blade on the shelf.
Jim
Title: Re: Which fan is correct for 1965 289
Post by: Brian Conway on February 18, 2014, 10:52:46 PM
     My reason for posting the pictures and asking the question is quite simple.  If after some review and if the fan is correct I would like to forward the information to the Mustang Tek site.  Brian
Title: Re: Which fan is correct for 1965 289
Post by: MattDoscher on September 01, 2014, 12:10:58 AM
Good info, thanks.  Just to confirm C code non-a/c cars did not have a fan shroud right?

Matt
Title: Re: Which fan is correct for 1965 289
Post by: markb0729 on September 01, 2014, 01:46:40 AM
Correct.  C code Mustangs without A/C did not have the fan shroud. 
Title: Re: Which fan is correct for 1965 289
Post by: MattDoscher on September 01, 2014, 10:23:25 AM
Thanks Mark.

Matt
Title: Re: Which fan is correct for 1965 289
Post by: MattDoscher on September 02, 2014, 07:57:06 PM
Regarding the fan spacer, my current spacer measures 2.25", would this be correct for both A and C code '65 Mustangs with the 4 blade C2OA B fan and without a/c?

thanks,

Matt
Title: Re: Which fan is correct for 1965 289
Post by: jwc66k on September 03, 2014, 12:27:17 AM
The spacer is measured from the top of the fan centering post, the hump, to the mounting surface where it attaches to the pulley. It is not measured from mounting surface to mounting surface. It's a Ford thing. Except for HP engines, the spacer is the same for 64 thru 66 Mustang V8 engines. There is no part number on it either.
Jim
Title: Re: Which fan is correct for 1965 289
Post by: MattDoscher on September 03, 2014, 09:03:07 AM
Thanks Jim for the clarification.  It sounds like I have the correct spacer.

Matt
Title: Re: Which fan is correct for 1965 289
Post by: priceless on September 04, 2014, 04:35:42 PM
I'm wondering why the mustangtek website isn't showing any information (not talking about photos) on these blades you all are discussing.....

Looks like what you guys are talking about is very useful information.