ConcoursMustang Forums

1st Generation 1964 1/2 - 1973 - Questions & general discussions that apply to a specific year => 1968 Shelby => Topic started by: nham3407 on December 22, 2010, 03:09:59 PM

Title: 68 GT500 KR Convertible
Post by: nham3407 on December 22, 2010, 03:09:59 PM
Trying to get some information regarding Shelby's.  I know of a 68 GT500KR barn car and have taken some pictures of it.  My question is, Did Shelby or Ford stamp the VIN number at the top of the shock tower on the front side?  This car appears to be a true Shelby, but I have never seen the VIN on the shock tower before.  Just to clarify, this is on the shock tower and not on the apron.
Title: Re: 68 GT500 KR Convertible
Post by: Bob Gaines on December 22, 2010, 06:10:08 PM
Trying to get some information regarding Shelby's.  I know of a 68 GT500KR barn car and have taken some pictures of it.  My question is, Did Shelby or Ford stamp the VIN number at the top of the shock tower on the front side?  This car appears to be a true Shelby, but I have never seen the VIN on the shock tower before.  Just to clarify, this is on the shock tower and not on the apron.
I haven't seen any examples of the " Ford " VIN being stamped on the shock tower before but maybe others have different observations. I have seen many odd Ford VIN stampings . It would be prudent to check the VIN numbers in the normal areas to confirm they coincide. If no VIN in the normal areas then it would open the door to other possibilities about its authenticity IMHO. Bob 
Title: Re: 68 GT500 KR Convertible
Post by: J_Speegle on December 22, 2010, 09:07:39 PM
Never seen a HJ built Mustang (or ant Shelby) stamped in that manner.

Does it (the stamping) have the star on the leading and trailing end?
Title: Re: 68 GT500 KR Convertible
Post by: T Lea on December 23, 2010, 07:14:33 PM
I have never seen a stamping on a 68 shock tower on any mustang/shelby. I would start with the apron stamp and go from there. If you need more info you can pm me.
Title: Re: 68 GT500 KR Convertible
Post by: thefordshow on December 24, 2010, 07:35:57 PM
Sounds odd for a '68, but as Tim pointed out I would investigate all the aprons for a correct number first.