ConcoursMustang Forums

1st Generation 1964 1/2 - 1973 - Questions & general discussions that apply to a specific year => 1971 - 1973 => Topic started by: camelback on April 29, 2012, 02:47:43 AM

Title: Seat rack/frame Mach1 vs standard
Post by: camelback on April 29, 2012, 02:47:43 AM
Does anyone know if the seat frames of a Mach1 is different from standard seats?
Need new Mach1 seats and I'm wondering if its possible to upholster standard seat frames with Mach1 upholstery.Thanx!
Title: Re: Seat rack/frame Mach1 vs standard
Post by: Andrew@MagMustangs on April 29, 2012, 09:53:40 PM
As far as I'm aware of they are the same Seat. You can upholster them in any pattern.

Cars with Convenience Group have Automatic Seat Back Releases and cars with this Option have the equipment inside the seat to make this work.

1973 Seat are different then 71-72 seats.  The Manual Release Levers to fold the seat forward are in different locations. I hope that helps.
Title: Re: Seat rack/frame Mach1 vs standard
Post by: camelback on April 30, 2012, 03:19:40 PM
Thank you! Do you know the difference between coupe and convertible seats? I know they are not interchangeable on earlier Mustangs but not sure on '71-'73 models...
Title: Re: Seat rack/frame Mach1 vs standard
Post by: benrohlfing on June 03, 2014, 06:07:56 PM
You may have already done your seats.  I wanted to recommend on the seam foam if you replace it to use the Mach I seat foam if you are doing Mach I upholstery.  We tried the one size fits all and they did not fit at all the same way.
Title: Re: Seat rack/frame Mach1 vs standard
Post by: Andrew@MagMustangs on September 01, 2014, 11:39:41 PM
Thank you! Do you know the difference between coupe and convertible seats? I know they are not interchangeable on earlier Mustangs but not sure on '71-'73 models...
I'm sorry, I'm not sure how I missed responding to this and should have responded long ago.

The difference between coupe and convertible seats for earlier 65-70 Mustangs was just the hardware that mounted the seat guide tracks to the seat itself. Ford used a bell-shaped spacer and longer screws to raise the seat on 'verts probably 1" or so because the convertible had wider rockers/sills. There were not any differences in the actual seat itself. I have never actually had a 71-73 Convertible so I am not positive if this was still the arrangement used on 71-73.
Title: Re: Seat rack/frame Mach1 vs standard
Post by: Bob Gaines on September 02, 2014, 01:31:14 AM
I'm sorry, I'm not sure how I missed responding to this and should have responded long ago.

The difference between coupe and convertible seats for earlier 65-70 Mustangs was just the hardware that mounted the seat guide tracks to the seat itself. Ford used a bell-shaped spacer and longer screws to raise the seat on 'verts probably 1" or so because the convertible had wider rockers/sills. There were not any differences in the actual seat itself. I have never actually had a 71-73 Convertible so I am not positive if this was still the arrangement used on 71-73.
Andrew,I have only noticed the bell shaped spacer for the seat tracks used on 69 convertibles and then not the entire year .I think early 69 had them and then phased out in later 69.Has anyone else seen the bell shaped spacer used on 65-68 converts?
Title: Re: Seat rack/frame Mach1 vs standard
Post by: Andrew@MagMustangs on September 03, 2014, 08:17:59 PM
Andrew,I have only noticed the bell shaped spacer for the seat tracks used on 69 convertibles and then not the entire year .I think early 69 had them and then phased out in later 69.Has anyone else seen the bell shaped spacer used on 65-68 converts?
Thanks for responding Bob. I trust your observations.