ConcoursMustang Forums

Restoring - General discussions that span across many different groups of years and models => Parts => Topic started by: cobrajetchris on July 29, 2015, 06:55:08 PM

Title: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: cobrajetchris on July 29, 2015, 06:55:08 PM
This is the second group 27 battery that went bad on me in 2 years and I have kept it trickle charged with a battery tender and more loving care than I ever would dream of doing to my riding lawn mower battery that I paid $40.00 bucks for 3 years ago that still works fine with no maintenance at all. I am going to buy a Motorcraft battery and be done with it. $259.00 for a worthless boat anchor, NEVER AGAIN. Dealing with all of this reproduction garbage out there is the most challenging part of this hobby.  >:(
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: Brian Conway on July 29, 2015, 07:36:53 PM
     I just bought one of these today.  NPD, Group 27, ' Sealed Maintenance Free ' $288.00.  I got one of these about six years ago from Antique Auto Battery and it was nothing but a bad experience from day one.  It was $255.00 + s&h $47.00.  It was a liquid battery, would not hold a charge so I shipped it back another $50.00.  They got the battery and determined I had done something to cause it to fail and refused a refund.  I was not real happy with the treatment I received.  I have had two Group 24's in my 65 in the last 15 years and they seem to hold up just fine.  So I understand the anger.  Brian   
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: ruppstang on July 29, 2015, 08:14:47 PM
I had trouble with a group 24. I ended up buying a new acid fill and have never filled it. I also bought a $75 dollar auto parts battery that I drive with and change to the Autolite for the shows. I wish that some one would offer a Autolite empty case.
You might want to consider cutting open the bottom of your case and removing the lead plates. Then you will not need to buy any thing but a dependable battery.
Marty 
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: MattDoscher on July 29, 2015, 10:51:21 PM
Just go with the reproduction topper on your modern battery.  From the top it looks factory and it's a good alternative to spending big money on a NOS or repro whole battery.
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: ruppstang on July 29, 2015, 11:14:51 PM
Just go with the reproduction topper on your modern battery.  From the top it looks factory and it's a good alternative to spending big money on a NOS or repro whole battery.

Those toppers are good for every day looks but will earn you a 6 point deduction in MCA concours classes.
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: ChrisV289 on July 30, 2015, 12:47:06 AM
I had trouble with a group 24. I ended up buying a new acid fill and have never filled it. I also bought a $75 dollar auto parts battery that I drive with and change to the Autolite for the shows. I wish that some one would offer a Autolite empty case.
You might want to consider cutting open the bottom of your case and removing the lead plates. Then you will not need to buy any thing but a dependable battery.
Marty

One of my friends did the same thing. Cut the top off, gutted the inside and glued the top back on.  Just swap out batteries at the show and use a dead battery while on the field.  Weighs a lot less too  ;)
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: carlite65 on July 30, 2015, 09:07:46 AM
Those toppers are good for every day looks but will earn you a 6 point deduction in MCA concours classes.

current rules state only a 3 point deduction. i wish it were 6.
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: ruppstang on July 30, 2015, 09:59:59 AM
current rules state only a 3 point deduction. i wish it were 6.
I should have said I was referring to the current 67-68 Shelby judge sheet -6 deduction.
Marty
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: Laurie S. on July 30, 2015, 04:13:21 PM
Take an Autolite battery box, cut the top off and remove the insides carefully.  Get a wheelchair battery, set up the posts with shorter cables in the box, and you're good to go.  I've had that in my 68 coupe for more than 10 years now.  If you keep it on the battery tender the small batteries will last three or four years.  And, they start my 289 just fine. 

It is harder with the 65/66 models, but it can be done.  My friend did it on his Shelby.
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: Richard P. on July 30, 2015, 11:27:10 PM
If the 1965/66 rules state 3 point deduction for the topper cover on the battery and the 1967/68 rules state 6 point deduction for the topper cover  on the battery their is inconsistency in the MCA judging rules. That should be fixed as I feel the point deduction should be the same across the board or concourse cars.
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: carlite65 on July 31, 2015, 08:54:12 AM
the rules are consistent on that point between those groups. he was referring to the shelby rules.
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: Richard P. on July 31, 2015, 03:20:27 PM
the rules are consistent on that point between those groups. he was referring to the shelby rules.
I don't think that the 1965/66 Shelby batteries are any different than that of a 1965/66 Mustang . Please correct me if I'm wrong. If they are different then I can see the deduction for the toppers being different. IMHO we are the same MCA club and our rules need to  follow some kind of pattern. I agree with you Carlite65 the point deduction for the toppers covers should be 6 points across the board.
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: ruppstang on July 31, 2015, 11:37:16 PM
I don't think that the 1965/66 Shelby batteries are any different than that of a 1965/66 Mustang . Please correct me if I'm wrong. If they are different then I can see the deduction for the toppers being different. IMHO we are the same MCA club and our rules need to  follow some kind of pattern. I agree with you Carlite65 the point deduction for the toppers covers should be 6 points across the board.

I think this discussion would be more useful at the MCA judges meeting in September. See you there?
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: J_Speegle on August 01, 2015, 12:27:46 AM
Believe the sheets matched at one point then they got changed. Charles & Pete spent allot of time making sure things were consistent across the early sheets.

Should not be a problem changing the 65-55 back to 6 point deduction The intent was do remove the motivation to use these since they are not even close to the original battery in look - the point/focus of the class
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: carlite65 on August 01, 2015, 08:00:57 AM
I think this discussion would be more useful at the MCA judges meeting in September. See you there?

you betcha!!
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: Smokey 15 on August 01, 2015, 12:49:40 PM
 Has anyone, who has had trouble with these 'junk' batteries, contacted the manufacturer?  After no satisfaction from the seller, that would be my next move. I am getting sick of buying "licensed from the O.E.M." repop parts that don't work or fit properly.
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: Bob Gaines on August 01, 2015, 12:58:59 PM
Has anyone, who has had trouble with these 'junk' batteries, contacted the manufacturer?  After no satisfaction from the seller, that would be my next move. I am getting sick of buying "licensed from the O.E.M." repop parts that don't work or fit properly.
If you have tried to buy one recently you will find that they are in short supply. One MFG stopped making them all together so there is only one MFG now. NPD stopped carrying them as well as numerous others most likely because of problems (besides small available mark up). Virginia is running 4 weeks from time of order because ether they don't want to stock them or the MFG wants them sent out fresh . 
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: NEFaurora on August 19, 2015, 04:24:30 PM


I would'nt buy Motorcraft Batteries..  The last 4 Motorcraft batteries that I've had never went over 3 years... Two of them barely went 2 1/2 years.   I suggest buying an Interstate Battery...  They last 6-7 years easy..  Just my experience.

:o)

Tony K.
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: 67gta289 on August 19, 2015, 04:31:46 PM
Not all created equal I guess.  I maintain a lot of Fords in the extended family, and generally speaking the original (factory) batteries last from 6 to 8 years.  For aftermarket Motorcraft I get 5 to 7 years.  Never had one last less than 5.  I have used other batteries a couple of times (never Interstate though) and they lasted 2-3 years, so I'm back to Motorcraft to stay.
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: roddster on September 08, 2015, 11:20:19 AM
  Save your dead old repop batteries.  Eventually, they too might disappear.
  I have cut the bottom out of one Fomoco battery, and one repop dead battery.  They have to be dried out or you are in for a real mess.  It takes an hour or so to cut the botton, cut the side wall separators, and dig out the dead lead.  Then drill into the bottom of the posts.  Tap the holes and install two short battery cables.
  A Mazda Miata battery will fit up inside.  There you go.  Now just buy a roughly one hundred dollar battery forever when needed.
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: GT500KR on September 08, 2015, 01:13:36 PM
  Save your dead old repop batteries.  Eventually, they too might disappear.
  I have cut the bottom out of one Fomoco battery, and one repop dead battery.  They have to be dried out or you are in for a real mess.  It takes an hour or so to cut the botton, cut the side wall separators, and dig out the dead lead.  Then drill into the bottom of the posts.  Tap the holes and install two short battery cables.
  A Mazda Miata battery will fit up inside.  There you go.  Now just buy a roughly one hundred dollar battery forever when needed.
Any particular model year, or group size for the Miata battery?
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: ajd350 on September 08, 2015, 09:47:56 PM
A U-series lawn tractor battery will also fit in a group 24 case. I've found them up to 350CCA. All four of my 289s run them.
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: WT8095 on September 08, 2015, 10:50:08 PM
For a retro project car (1929 Model A Speedster replica) I wanted an old-timey looking battery. I built a shell out of phenolic to simulate a bakelite case, and put an Odyssey PC925 dry cell motorcycle battery inside. The speedster has a 200 six from a '66 Mustang, and the battery spun that engine like crazy. I have no doubt it would work just fine on a V-8. That battery survived 10+ years of intermittant use, including storage in an unheated garage through Minnesota winters. That's subzero temps, without use or a battery tender. I am ashamed that I didn't take better care of it, but it handled the abuse far better than any other battery I've ever owned. Odyssey makes a wide range of similar batteries, I bet you could find one even bigger than the PC925 that would still fit in a group 24 case.
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: GT500KR on September 09, 2015, 12:28:32 AM
A U-series lawn tractor battery will also fit in a group 24 case. I've found them up to 350CCA. All four of my 289s run them.
Glad that's working for your 289. Not sure if 350cca will fill the float bowls on a Cobra Jet though... :/
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: Bob Gaines on September 09, 2015, 12:35:47 AM
The small batteries will spin a SB but I wouldn't count on one to spin a BB more then a few times. Believe me. Been there done that. Just good for SB's.
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: 69cobrajetrugae2 on September 14, 2015, 11:20:07 AM
I have a AUTOLITE 27 retro battery made by Axion power battery manufacturing co, 5 years old, 70 amp hours 78 plates, TURBO START.

The battery was in the car when I acquired it 3 years ago.  I removed the caps and added water to the cells as my first maintenance procedure, boy we're they thirsty!.  During the first year the battery was constantly spitting acid out of the vents and was not due to an overcharge condition. I called the manufacturer and spoke to an engineer to inquire why the battery was spitting acid.

The engineer seemed surprised that anyone would do such a stupid thing as to add water to their battery.  They added a lifetime supply of water, or moisture as he called it, during the manufacturing process. I asked him if the battery was airtight and he said no, there are vents in the cap.  I said that it makes common sense that a few drops of moisture a year might be needed to keep the battery maintained. He said that's not possible because the caps are glued on. Why don't you tell your customers to add moisture, I asked.  Because they might damage the battery and add too much, besides, the lifespan is 4 years, he said.

To make a long story short, my battery was never short on capacity other than the acid spitting out of the caps.  I inverted the thing and drained the water and reinstalled it.  It's been two years now and that battery is just fine.  In fact, it performs better than any other battery I have tested.  It acts differently that a traditional acid lead battery. I left my headlights and high beams on for 45 minutes, the battery went from it's latent charge of 12.1V to 11.0, and the car started with a snap pulling down to 10.5V.  Next, I charged it with my battery charger, a 10 amp Schumacher, and watched the charger go from 8 amps to 2 amps in 30 seconds while the voltage across the battery terminals climbed to 13V. After an hour the amp draw was 1 or less and the voltage was 15.8V. When I disconnected the charger the battery voltage dropped to 13 in 30 seconds, and the next morning it was at it's usual, 12.1V.

A friend did the same thing by accident and his lasted 15 years.

I wondered why the caps we're so darn hard to remove!  If I hadn't done such stupid thing as to add water to my battery it would have shriveled up like a dead leaf and left me stranded somewhere.
Title: Re: reproduction autolite batteries are JUNK! I will take the points deduction.
Post by: rockhouse66 on July 24, 2016, 09:00:21 PM
Old post, but I visited to ask Roddster how he got a 7.25" tall Miata battery in a 6.75" tall Autolite case.  Sadly, he hasn't been here in at least a year.  Anyway, has anyone found a version of the Miata battery that will fit in the case?

I agree that the run of the mill stuff will spin a SBF but not a BB.  I am actually seriously considering two narrow motorcycle batteries connected in parallel to double the CCA into the 600 range.  I just had what I think is my 5th repro Autolite battery die suddenly and want to move on to something reliable.