Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Join us on Facebook: Search for 'ConcoursMustang' Private group!
Home
Help
Login
Register
ConcoursMustang Forums
»
Restoring - General discussions that span across many different groups of years and models
»
Parts
»
Topic:
Dynacorn Floor support VS Original
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Dynacorn Floor support VS Original (Read 910 times)
carguytroy
Jr. Member
Posts: 83
Dynacorn Floor support VS Original
«
on:
May 19, 2019, 06:16:43 PM »
Just thought I would share a couple of pics. I'm replacing the floor pan and some of the understructure as needed on my 1967 convertible as a start anyway. When I purchased the car it came with a Dynacorn full floor with the frame rails and the works. I decided I would pull parts off of the piece as I needed instead of using the full floor to keep as much original as possible. The floor supports were starting to rust through and bubble up so I cut out the rust of course, patched the rail where needed and tore out the rest of the floor support for replacement. From the looks of it other than a couple of holes missing, the date code, and swapping a bracket this is darn near perfect. Here's a couple of pics I took for comparison. I know its not a major thing, but I just thought I would share. Any thoughts or comments are appreciated.
Logged
1967 S code Convertible
Build Date 7-1967
San Jose
Vintage Burgundy
1967 C Code Convertible
Build date 7-1967
San Jose
White
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
ConcoursMustang Forums
»
Restoring - General discussions that span across many different groups of years and models
»
Parts
»
Topic:
Dynacorn Floor support VS Original