ConcoursMustang Forums

1st Generation 1964 1/2 - 1973 - Questions & general discussions that apply to a specific year => 1967 Mustang => Topic started by: Hipo giddyup on July 10, 2016, 12:39:15 PM

Title: 1967 shock markings
Post by: Hipo giddyup on July 10, 2016, 12:39:15 PM
 So I just finished painting my replacement shocks black but I am curious what paint marking should go on a Metuchin built 67 Mustang Coupe, 289 2v 3 spd, standard suspension. Attached is a picture of my build sheet and it shows "red" for both front and back. Is that the markings type? Would the paint markings be sprayed on  or brushed on? Any pics of original examples would be awesome!
Title: Re: 1967 shock markings
Post by: J_Speegle on July 10, 2016, 05:09:51 PM
http://www.concoursmustang.com/forum/index.php?topic=3111.msg19976#msg19976

http://www.concoursmustang.com/forum/index.php?topic=1461.msg8070#msg8070
Title: Re: 1967 shock markings
Post by: Hipo giddyup on July 10, 2016, 08:43:19 PM
Thanks Jeff. I searched but searched under paint markings.. Didnt think to search paint daubs.  :-[

So im not sure if that exactly answers my questions? Would i use red as noted on my build sheet? and it appears from your prior pictures that they were a quick brush on application.
Title: Re: 1967 shock markings
Post by: J_Speegle on July 10, 2016, 10:50:16 PM
Thanks Jeff. I searched but searched under paint markings.. Didnt think to search paint daubs. 

No worry - i didn't use "daubs" in my search - Just "shock paint marks"   8)

So im not sure if that exactly answers my questions? Would i use red as noted on my build sheet? and it appears from your prior pictures that they were a quick brush on application.


Is that the markings type? Would the paint markings be sprayed on  or brushed on? Any pics of original examples would be awesome!

Red is the color used - front and back. Daub or short thick stripe would be two ways of discribing what I'm seeing in the examples
Title: Re: 1967 shock markings
Post by: Hipo giddyup on July 10, 2016, 11:39:33 PM
Thank you. Will post some pics of my interpretation once I have time to install them. ;D
Title: Re: 1967 shock markings
Post by: Hipo giddyup on July 19, 2016, 02:20:49 PM
  Ok, one other question.. The paint markings that are put on the shocks at the factory, are these markings made as inspection of the parts (off the car), or when the shock is installed on the car, or made by a final inspector (inspecting a fully assembled car)??? Thanks
Title: Re: 1967 shock markings
Post by: J_Speegle on July 19, 2016, 02:25:44 PM
  Ok, one other question.. The paint markings that are put on the shocks at the factory, are these markings made as inspection of the parts (off the car), or when the shock is installed on the car, or made by a final inspector (inspecting a fully assembled car)??? Thanks

Applied (from our understanding) by the maker/provider. So at the Gabriel plant in Canada or the US depending on the shock and the car assembly plant

This way the shocks could be moved quickly to the line and the color marking used by the worker to select the correct ones for the individual car
Title: Re: 1967 shock markings
Post by: jwc66k on July 19, 2016, 04:20:04 PM
A bit of history. When Henry Ford set up his automobile assembly lines, he used colors to identify different applications for certain parts. The reason was simple, most workers did not know how to read. The use of color codes also "sped up" the assembly lines if you didn't have to read a tag or label, time was money. The practice continued as why fix something that isn't broke. The use of computers in parts management may have reduced the color coding, but not replaced it.
Jim
Title: Re: 1967 shock markings
Post by: Hipo giddyup on July 19, 2016, 04:55:34 PM
Thanks guys!!  I had heard of that, and was it also true that one color was for the passenger side and another color for the drivers side such as on sway bars?? Maybe thats a myth..

Title: Re: 1967 shock markings
Post by: 67gtasanjose on July 19, 2016, 04:58:11 PM
A bit of history. When Henry Ford set up his automobile assembly lines, he used colors to identify different applications for certain parts. The reason was simple, most workers did not know how to read. The use of color codes also "sped up" the assembly lines if you didn't have to read a tag or label, time was money. The practice continued as why fix something that isn't broke. The use of computers in parts management may have reduced the color coding, but not replaced it.
Jim

Maybe explains a few anomalies...maybe a few Color-blind illiterates on the assembly line :)
Title: Re: 1967 shock markings
Post by: J_Speegle on July 19, 2016, 06:41:31 PM
Thanks guys!!  I had heard of that, and was it also true that one color was for the passenger side and another color for the drivers side such as on sway bars?? Maybe that's a myth..


On a few parts (certain years, models and applications) there appears to be markings or color arranged to show direction of installation but in  my experience the number of applications are very few and does not apply to sway bars other than the one application that happens to include green and yellow and their locations may just be a coincidence  or something that provided the urban understanding more possible support
Title: Re: 1967 shock markings
Post by: Hipo giddyup on August 06, 2016, 02:53:30 PM
 Finally got around to finishing the shock install. I'm happy with results, though the paint markings might be a little large. I used a 1" brush and made a quick sweep to apply the color. Ultimately it rides more comfortably than than before with the performance shocks. And also now looks more correct.