ConcoursMustang Forums
1st Generation 1964 1/2 - 1973 - Questions & general discussions that apply to a specific year => 1967 Mustang => Topic started by: Armond on January 21, 2011, 06:42:48 PM
-
I would like some input on the gas line protector pictures below. Was it painted black or left natural or phosphate. I am sure there is someone with a real original car who might know. Opinions welcomed. Thanks!
(http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k297/Armond61/68bodypaint068.jpg)
-
Armond, I've never seen one other than black. Attaching bolts, phosphate.
-
Thank you!
-
I believe it should be dipped and not sprayed.
-
I just looked under my unrestored 67 San Jose Coupe and it's protector is black.
-
I have seen a number of 67 San Jose cars with the protector in bare steel . Not to say it was the only way but have seen more that were bare steel then the dipped black on the 67 San Jose Shelby's I am used to looking at. In 68 it was just the oposite I don't think I have ever come across one that was bare steel on a 68 NJ car (Shelby again) . Just a few variations which may have to do with the plant and supply at the time IMHO. Bob
-
Did all 68 cars get them ???????
-
Did all 68 cars get them ???????
All 67 and 68's got them regardless if they were painted or not. Bob
-
All 67 and 68's got them regardless if they were painted or not. Bob
-
Correction not all 67s got them. Early 67s with the one-piece gas line did not use this bracket.
Regards,
Pete Morgan
-
Correction not all 67s got them. Early 67s with the one-piece gas line did not use this bracket.
Regards,
Pete Morgan
Thanks Pete . I had brain fade and was only thinking about the gas lines as they related to this thread. I should have qualified that with saying the all 67 and 68's with the cross over line had the protector. Bob
-
Thanks Pete . I had brain fade and was only thinking about the gas lines as they related to this thread. I should have qualified that with saying the all 67 and 68's with the cross over line had the protector. Bob
Just a question, did the 68.5 manual cobra jet & shelbys (with staggered shocks) use this guard?
Thanks
Matt
-
This is the answer i was looking for.
-
Just a question, did the 68.5 manual cobra jet & shelbys (with staggered shocks) use this guard?
Thanks
Matt
Take 2
This is the answer i was looking for also but was going to add latter.
-
No. The fuel line doesn't cross over on a CJ/KR 4 spd car so no need for guard.
-
No. The fuel line doesn't cross over on a CJ/KR 4 spd car so no need for guard.
Thanks
Matt
-
Just a question, did the 68.5 manual cobra jet & shelbys (with staggered shocks) use this guard?
Thanks
Matt
Thanks Pete . I had brain fade and was only thinking about the gas lines as they related to this thread. I should have qualified that with saying the all 67 and 68's with the cross over line had the protector. Bob
Just a question, did the 68.5 manual cobra jet & shelbys (with staggered shocks) use this guard?
Thanks
Matt [/quote] And CJ 4 speed . I told you I had brain fade. :-[ . Bob
-
No. The fuel line doesn't cross over on a CJ/KR 4 spd car so no need for guard.
Why were they different ????
larger diam ?????
seems strange ??????would have PIA at the factory.
regards Russell
-
My guess and its only a guess, would be that the standard fuel line setup would foul against the staggered shocker setup of the manual 68.5s?
Matt
-
My guess and its only a guess, would be that the standard fuel line setup would foul against the staggered shocker setup of the manual 68.5s?
Matt
Matt
No the bend of fuel line is in front of rear wheel..
the staggered shock lines are different at the rearward of the wheel.
regards Russell