ConcoursMustang Forums

1st Generation 1964 1/2 - 1973 - Questions & general discussions that apply to a specific year => 1969 Mustang => Topic started by: STAUBY38 on February 16, 2021, 04:30:02 PM

Title: 1969 MACH 1 Original vs Dealer Installed Questions
Post by: STAUBY38 on February 16, 2021, 04:30:02 PM
I recently obtained my Elite Marti for my Mach 1 and found it is a 1 of 1 car if i'm reading it correctly.  It was left to sit in a garage since 1984 and I recently saved it from its continuing seclusion.   The car matches the Marti with the options ordered except the car was not shown as having power steering however it does and all appears to be original part number era correct.   Was this dealer installed or was it missed on the Marti??  Unfortunately I have no way of finding that out because the original owner and his paperwork are long gone.  The build sheet along with the carpet is long gone too.  Has anyone seen this type of issue before?   Is there any way to tell a dealer install?

The big question is,  Do I leave as found and keep it with power steering or do I match the Marti and return it to manual?   How does this affect the value ?

Thanks as always!
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: J_Speegle on February 16, 2021, 04:41:35 PM
What does the report show down in the options. He won't always include some options in the attempt to get to the one of one so many want and are paying for in that section of the report

Looking at a bunch of other 69 reports Power Steering is called out in the lower section on other cars like yours 

Do have 69 S code Mach I's ordered with and without power steering

Guess you have already looked for the cars build sheet That would confirm things. Always a possibility of the report being off (we are human) but not likely
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: 67gta289 on February 16, 2021, 04:46:39 PM
You are interpreting it correctly as a one of one.  That said, it did take 11 lines to get down to a one of one designation.  It is often said that each car is a one of one if you consider the VIN.

If your Marti report does not identify the power steering option, then it was added outside of the factory.  The good news is that it sounds like it is era correct.  Without dealer paperwork, it is impossible to know who did it and when.  Dealer paperwork is very rare, it would have to been saved by the original owner and passed on through every purchase to you.  Highly unlikely IMO.

How does it affect value?  That depends on a lot of variables.  When you go to sell, it might just be to someone that is on the cusp of needing shoulder replacement, and they might not want to buy a car with armstrong steering.  Then again they might not want a 4-speed either!  This is one of those "it's all about choices" situations. 
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: STAUBY38 on February 16, 2021, 04:51:13 PM
Here are the options listed.   I don't have a pic of the Elite with me but I also had this standard report the guy gave me   Options show same on both.. 
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: STAUBY38 on February 16, 2021, 04:55:38 PM
Makes sense John   I figured there was no way of telling.  In a judging situation either Concours or MCA would power steering in this instance take points off of the car?
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: STAUBY38 on February 16, 2021, 04:56:59 PM
Thanks Jeff   I get that too.   Always more questions then answers!
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: J_Speegle on February 16, 2021, 05:01:47 PM
Makes sense John   I figured there was no way of telling.  In a judging situation either Concours or MCA would power steering in this instance take points off of the car?

No deduction since the judges would not be aware that the car didn't originally come with it. Only the details, parts, finishes and such are fair game at that point. At the time Marti reports are not required for Concours judging and I would not anticipating that the organization would raise the bar anytime soon

Did check about a dozen 69 S code Marti reports I have copies of and not a one listed the engine dress-up option
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: STAUBY38 on February 16, 2021, 05:05:47 PM
Very good info  Thank you !       So we don't know either what denoted the dress up kit and how it was ordered or optioned?   UGH  More questions..
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: J_Speegle on February 16, 2021, 05:18:48 PM
I think we know how it was ordered, just a box checked on the order form. Just don't know how Kevin designates it on a report or what box on the buildsheet it shows up on. Haven't really looked at build sheets. don't recall a call out on one of the boxes. Might just used one fo the numbered unlabeled boxes
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: Harry1003 on February 17, 2021, 12:41:46 PM
Hi,
can anybody show me some pictures from the "sport deck rear seats"?

Thank you!!

Greetings Harry :)
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: mtinkham on February 17, 2021, 02:08:13 PM
Manual vs. Power, could you look at the tag on the steering box to see if it might be a manual box?
In referencing Marcus Anghel's incredible restoration guide, there are two manual steering boxes and one power steering box for 1969. If the box is a manual steering box, that might help provide an answer as to how your car left the factory. Of course, if it is a power steering box, then you would not have any additional information - just that whoever made the conversion to power, was thorough!
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: STAUBY38 on February 17, 2021, 08:31:39 PM
Yes I still have to confirm which steering box is on the car.  That is the last link in my research chain for the steering issue.  TBC
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: 67gta289 on February 17, 2021, 08:39:34 PM
Hi,
can anybody show me some pictures from the "sport deck rear seats"?

Thank you!!

Greetings Harry :)

This is the Ford term for what is commonly called the "fold-down rear seat"  Did you look in unrestored picture area? http://www.concoursmustang.com/forum/index.php?board=66.0
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: krelboyne on February 17, 2021, 10:24:01 PM
What is the number on the P/S pulley?  Factory cars should have come with an 80B, in 1969, same as 428CJ if without A/C.
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: specialed on February 18, 2021, 12:44:50 PM
Check all date codes as the p/s box has cast date and tag date  all hoses have dates and control valve spool cap and slave cyl. are dated as well as date code on the pump tag id.
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: Bob Gaines on February 18, 2021, 01:16:49 PM
At the end of the day all things considered the car is more desirable with power steering then without given the market value and option desirability. With my judges cap on a 69 Mach I in judged competition without power steering would raise more eyebrows (not in a admirable way) as unusual then one with .
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: jwc66k on February 18, 2021, 04:37:14 PM
Do I leave as found and keep it with power steering or do I match the Marti and return it to manual?   How does this affect the value ?
As a "driver", power steering might be a desirable add-on. My special order 69 Sportsroof (San Jose, May 69), 351W, 4v, 4sp, did not have power steering and I had no problems in either towing (a dune buggy) or "rat racing" (up some of the roads in the Santa Cruz Mountains).
As a car being shown and depending on class, I would be inclined to deduct points for - not as original (I'm a purist).
Jim
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: J_Speegle on February 18, 2021, 04:53:16 PM
In judging I would take notice just as I would with any detail presented might acknowledge it to the rest of the team or someone might make a comment about how big the original owners arms must have gotten :) . No different in seeing non power steering equipped Boss 302 or 428 cars. Just would find it interesting for a moment then move on. Often purpose purchased cars (cars they planned to do some racing with) would be ordered with PS or Disc brakes depending on how they planned on being used
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: STAUBY38 on February 18, 2021, 08:03:05 PM
I will compile those items and see what the part numbers all say.  Car is tucked away for the moment so I have go there and start looking.  Great info   I appreciate it !  TBC. 
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: Coralsnake on February 23, 2021, 07:43:58 AM
Finding a car thats not a one of one is a much bigger challenge. A nice marketing gimmick, but not particularly informative for owners
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: specialed on February 23, 2021, 11:59:15 AM
Factory p/s cars had those 2 redish dye long well nuts pressed up into the lh frame rail hex shaped holes for installing the cast iron slave cyl bracket.  But if u bought a complete ford p/s kit from ford back in the late 60s those frame rail 2 nuts came with the kit and after they were pressed in place and u tighten the 2 bolts the top of the tall well nut  would spread apart and stay in place like a rivet would.  This is another way to tell a factory 4-speed car if the nuts are pressed into top of frame rail holes for the z-bar inner pivot bracket to be installed from factory.
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: STAUBY38 on February 23, 2021, 10:45:26 PM
Ok Interesting, I will look at that and see what they look like.
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: preaction on February 23, 2021, 11:22:08 PM
In judging I would take notice just as I would with any detail presented might acknowledge it to the rest of the team or someone might make a comment about how big the original owners arms must have gotten :) . No different in seeing non power steering equipped Boss 302 or 428 cars. Just would find it interesting for a moment then move on. Often purpose purchased cars (cars they planned to do some racing with) would be ordered with PS or Disc brakes depending on how they planned on being used
Would this be a good reason to leave a Marti report on the dash of a car being judged at a MCA concours level even though I believe they are not used or required ?
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: NoSize on February 24, 2021, 03:59:43 PM
As a "driver", power steering might be a desirable add-on. My special order 69 Sportsroof (San Jose, May 69), 351W, 4v, 4sp, did not have power steering and I had no problems in either towing (a dune buggy) or "rat racing" (up some of the roads in the Santa Cruz Mountains).
As a car being shown and depending on class, I would be inclined to deduct points for - not as original (I'm a purist).
Jim
My 69 Mach 351W didn't have power steering AND had front drum brakes. 
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: carlite65 on February 24, 2021, 04:04:44 PM
Would this be a good reason to leave a Marti report on the dash of a car being judged at a MCA concours level even though I believe they are not used or required ?
not in my opinion. when judges first approach and introduce themselves they are supposed to ask if there is anything unusual about the car. that is the time to present your information. you make your case and they can agree or disagree.
Title: Re: 1969 MACH 1 ORIGINAL VS DEALER INSTALL QUESTIONS
Post by: preaction on February 24, 2021, 05:29:43 PM
Thank you for the insight. :)