Author Topic: Name That Part  (Read 2618 times)

1967 eight barrel

  • Guest
Re: Name That Part
« Reply #15 on: January 18, 2019, 06:32:32 PM »
NOS sticker or pump assembly?

Offline 67gtasanjose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5091
  • "Take the MUSTANG PLEDGE"
Re: Name That Part
« Reply #16 on: January 18, 2019, 08:54:57 PM »
NOS sticker or pump assembly?
NOS sticker on a NOS pump

My original has no sign of a sticker. I repainted the SGB about a year ago. I do not recall it had it or did not have it. I do recall the yellow paint daub and the color coding for the wiring connections.
Richard Urch

1967 (11/2/66, S.J.) GTA Luxury Coupe, 289-4V w/Thermactor Emissions, C-4, Int./Ext. Decor +many options

2005 (04/05) GT Premium Convertible, Windveil Blue, Parchment Top w/Med. Parchment interior,  Roush Body Appointments

Offline Bossbill

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3279
  • In the middle of project hell
Re: Name That Part
« Reply #17 on: January 18, 2019, 09:26:55 PM »
NOS sticker on a NOS pump

My original has no sign of a sticker. I repainted the SGB about a year ago. I do not recall it had it or did not have it. I do recall the yellow paint daub and the color coding for the wiring connections.

Thanks for the pictures. That helps a lot.
And, that's a really nice piece. I think Keith is drooling.

As you say, it appears that the service part carries the sticker, whereas the originals would not. That clears that up!
See later post.

Thanks to everyone for the feedback. You guys are great.
« Last Edit: January 19, 2019, 05:58:37 PM by Bossbill »
Bill
Concours  Actual Ford Build 3/2/67 GT350 01375
Driven      6/6/70 0T02G160xxx Boss 302
Modified   5/18/65 5F09A728xxx Boss 347 Terminator-X 8-Stack
Race        65 2+2 Coupe conversion

Offline 196667Bob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1054
Re: Name That Part
« Reply #18 on: January 18, 2019, 09:38:51 PM »
My wipers don't work when I step on mine.  I had to mask the sticker off with low-tack hobby masking tape when I painted mine. Has anyone else had the wipers not function with the pedal post reassembly?
                                                                                                                                -Keith
   

Keith : The rubber bellows on our 67's look identical to the ones on the Early Birds. The reason I bring this up is that NPD has a Repair Kit, as well as the individual pieces, for the Early Bird W/S Washer Pumps. You night want to check further to see if that might work. In looking back at NPD again, they do show the Bellows inly for '67(https://www.npdlink.com/product/pump-windshield-washer-foot-operated-rubber-bellow-only/146370?backurl=search%2Fproducts%3Fsearch_terms%3DW%25252FS%252BWasher%252BPump%26top_parent%3D200001%26year%3D1967&year=1967

Bob
1966 Coupe, C Code, 3 Sp MT, 6T07C154XXX, Build Date 11/22/65
1967 Conv, C Code, C4, 7F03C154XXX, Actual Build Date 01/31/67
MCA 04909

1967 eight barrel

  • Guest
Re: Name That Part
« Reply #19 on: January 18, 2019, 11:07:20 PM »
Keith : The rubber bellows on our 67's look identical to the ones on the Early Birds. The reason I bring this up is that NPD has a Repair Kit, as well as the individual pieces, for the Early Bird W/S Washer Pumps. You night want to check further to see if that might work. In looking back at NPD again, they do show the Bellows inly for '67(https://www.npdlink.com/product/pump-windshield-washer-foot-operated-rubber-bellow-only/146370?backurl=search%2Fproducts%3Fsearch_terms%3DW%25252FS%252BWasher%252BPump%26top_parent%3D200001%26year%3D1967&year=1967

Bob
Hello, Bob!  I saw the pump was out there in the newest catalog. However, I am suspect something failed in the switch. It may even be The paper that protects it was looking ratty. I didn't test it before reinstalling it because the electronics and the way they were wired make it very hard to test.

                                                                                                                                                  -Keith

Offline 67gta289

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3080
Re: Name That Part
« Reply #20 on: January 19, 2019, 07:20:53 AM »
As you say, it appears that the service part carries the sticker, whereas the originals would not. That clears that up!

The last three unrestored cars I have pulled these from, one each from SJ, Dearborn, and NJ, all have stickers on them.  I think the stickers were day 1 items based on that.
John
67 289 GTA Dec 20 1966 San Jose
7R02C156xxx
MCA 74660

Offline 67gta289

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3080
Re: Name That Part
« Reply #21 on: January 19, 2019, 08:31:56 AM »
Here is another post that came to mind - the sticker is shown, and there is a discussion between early and late wiring in relation to the pump

http://www.concoursmustang.com/forum/index.php?topic=8146.0

John
67 289 GTA Dec 20 1966 San Jose
7R02C156xxx
MCA 74660

Offline Bossbill

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3279
  • In the middle of project hell
Re: Name That Part
« Reply #22 on: January 19, 2019, 05:57:54 PM »
Ok, 67 changes/oddities rear their head again.
I'll update my post above.

But based on the Very Early Wiring post  it appears we have some different labels and colors.
We have a February 67 Dearborn car with  C7ZB-17664-A under a black FoMoCo script in an oval.
A September 66 SJ car with no part number and red FoMoCo script in an oval.
An October 66 NJ car with a C7ZB-17664-B and a black FoMoCo script in an oval.

Maybe my March car DOES need a C7ZB-17664-A with FoMoCo in an oval.
Bill
Concours  Actual Ford Build 3/2/67 GT350 01375
Driven      6/6/70 0T02G160xxx Boss 302
Modified   5/18/65 5F09A728xxx Boss 347 Terminator-X 8-Stack
Race        65 2+2 Coupe conversion

1967 eight barrel

  • Guest
Re: Name That Part
« Reply #23 on: January 19, 2019, 06:41:36 PM »
I have a late Nov 66 build 67 Shelby. Single connector. Harness and pump original to vehicle.  The decal as evident on assembly line installation and replacement are identical. 
This issue with my unit is when I step on it there is no cycle of the wipers. The pump is functional. I am suspect the switch in the pedal is faulty being the wipers work fine from the wiper switch.  I was able to work with a '67 cougar sequential harness and make it work, but following the path of the pedal switch made little to no sense.
I would have liked to have made a jumper to test the wiring at the connector to check the wiring.  I did unwrap the original under dash harness to check it's condition and for any wires that looked like they had been hot or showed signs of being brittle. I only found the courtesy switch wire had been hot ( my doing when it unplugged from the jamb switch and shorted. I replaced it with a wire from a donor harness. I replaced the fuse box fuse clips and wrapped the harness as it was done with the same materials. Then installed a reproduction harness tag. Everything works.. Just the pulse of the wiper from the pedal is an issue.
                                                                                                                                                     -Keith